Mixing Data‐Driven and Physics‐Based Constitutive Models Using Uncertainty‐Driven Phase Fields

ABSTRACT There is a high interest in accelerating multiscale models using data‐driven surrogate modeling techniques. Creating a large training dataset encompassing all relevant load scenarios is essential for a good surrogate, yet the computational cost of producing this data quickly becomes a limiting factor. Commonly, a pre‐trained surrogate is used throughout the computational domain. We introduce an alternative adaptive mixture approach that uses a fast probabilistic surrogate model as a constitutive model when possible, but resorts to the true high‐fidelity model when necessary. The surrogate is thus not required to be accurate for every possible load condition, enabling a significant reduction in the data collection time. We achieve this by creating phases in the computational domain corresponding to the different models. These phases evolve using a phase‐field model driven by the surrogate uncertainty. When the surrogate uncertainty becomes large, the phase‐field model causes a local transition from the surrogate to the high‐fidelity model, maintaining a highly accurate simulation. We discuss requirements for accuracy and numerical stability and compare the phase‐field model to a local approach that does not enforce spatial smoothness in phase mixing. Using a Gaussian Process surrogate for an elasto‐plastic material, we demonstrate the potential of this mixture of models to accelerate multiscale simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.70162
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixing Data‐Driven and Physics‐Based Constitutive Models Using Uncertainty‐Driven Phase Fields

John Storm, WaiChing Sun, F.P. van der Meer, I.B.C.M. Rocha
1 citations
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
1.32
article

Mixing Data‐Driven and Physics‐Based Constitutive Models Using Uncertainty‐Driven Phase Fields

John Storm, WaiChing Sun, F.P. van der Meer, I.B.C.M. Rocha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a high interest in accelerating multiscale models using data‐driven surrogate modeling techniques. Creating a large training dataset encompassing all relevant load scenarios is essential for a good surrogate, yet the computational cost of producing this data quickly becomes a limiting factor. Commonly, a pre‐trained surrogate is used throughout the computational domain. We introduce an alternative adaptive mixture approach that uses a fast probabilistic surrogate model as a constitutive model when possible, but resorts to the true high‐fidelity model when necessary. The surrogate is thus not required to be accurate for every possible load condition, enabling a significant reduction in the data collection time. We achieve this by creating phases in the computational domain corresponding to the different models. These phases evolve using a phase‐field model driven by the surrogate uncertainty. When the surrogate uncertainty becomes large, the phase‐field model causes a local transition from the surrogate to the high‐fidelity model, maintaining a highly accurate simulation. We discuss requirements for accuracy and numerical stability and compare the phase‐field model to a local approach that does not enforce spatial smoothness in phase mixing. Using a Gaussian Process surrogate for an elasto‐plastic material, we demonstrate the potential of this mixture of models to accelerate multiscale simulations.

International Journal for Numerical Methods in EngineeringVol. 126(20)
Columbia University (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Technische Universiteit Delft
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.