Forecasting agricultural drought: the Australian Agricultural Drought Indicators

Abstract. Drought is a recurrent and significant driver of stress on agricultural enterprises in Australia. Historically, rainfall indices have been used to identify drought and inform government responses. However, rainfall indicators may not fully reflect agricultural or economic drought conditions and are a lagging indicator. To address these shortcomings, the AADI (Australian Agricultural Drought Indicators) was recently developed to monitor and forecast drought for upcoming seasons using biophysical and agro-economic models, including crop yields, pasture growth and farm profit, at ∼ 5 km2 resolution. Here, we evaluate the skill of drought indicator forecasts driven by the ACCESS-S2 dynamical global climate model over a hindcast period from 1990–2018. Analysis of the AADI hindcasts finds that antecedent landscape conditions significantly enhance predictive skill for crop yields, pasture growth and farm profit across a financial year. As lead time shortens from 12 to 3 months, forecast confidence increases: median farm profit skill rises from 43 % at 12 months to 67 % and 73 % at 6 and 3 months, respectively, whilst median farm profit biases remain below 2 % across all lead times, with high reliability indicating a well-calibrated ensemble, making the forecasts highly suitable for risk management and decision-making. Forecasts for wheat, sorghum, and pasture are also skilful and reliable in ensemble spread, although residual biases can occur (e.g. up to 20 % for sorghum) and suggests further system refinements are needed. Analysis of historical events under both dry and wet conditions demonstrated the AADI system's ability to identify drought-impacted areas with increased confidence up to 6 months earlier than rainfall deficits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4053-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forecasting agricultural drought: the Australian Agricultural Drought Indicators

Zvi Hochman, Neal Hughes, John Carter, Dorine Bruget et al.
1 citations
Natural hazards and earth system sciences
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
1.11
article

Forecasting agricultural drought: the Australian Agricultural Drought Indicators

Zvi Hochman, Neal Hughes, John Carter, Dorine Bruget, Donald S. Gaydon, Andrew Schepen, Peter Taylor, Mihir Gupta, Chris Sharman, Peter Tan, Andrew Bolt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Drought is a recurrent and significant driver of stress on agricultural enterprises in Australia. Historically, rainfall indices have been used to identify drought and inform government responses. However, rainfall indicators may not fully reflect agricultural or economic drought conditions and are a lagging indicator. To address these shortcomings, the AADI (Australian Agricultural Drought Indicators) was recently developed to monitor and forecast drought for upcoming seasons using biophysical and agro-economic models, including crop yields, pasture growth and farm profit, at ∼ 5 km2 resolution. Here, we evaluate the skill of drought indicator forecasts driven by the ACCESS-S2 dynamical global climate model over a hindcast period from 1990–2018. Analysis of the AADI hindcasts finds that antecedent landscape conditions significantly enhance predictive skill for crop yields, pasture growth and farm profit across a financial year. As lead time shortens from 12 to 3 months, forecast confidence increases: median farm profit skill rises from 43 % at 12 months to 67 % and 73 % at 6 and 3 months, respectively, whilst median farm profit biases remain below 2 % across all lead times, with high reliability indicating a well-calibrated ensemble, making the forecasts highly suitable for risk management and decision-making. Forecasts for wheat, sorghum, and pasture are also skilful and reliable in ensemble spread, although residual biases can occur (e.g. up to 20 % for sorghum) and suggests further system refinements are needed. Analysis of historical events under both dry and wet conditions demonstrated the AADI system's ability to identify drought-impacted areas with increased confidence up to 6 months earlier than rainfall deficits.

Natural hazards and earth system sciencesVol. 25(10)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (AU), IP Australia (AU), Queensland Government (AU), Health Sciences and Nutrition (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.