Building a scientific community? The WOEPS workshop and the evolution of the economics of science, 1994–2023

The paper studies the development of the Economics of Science as a new emerging field in the social sciences during the period 1994–2023. To identify the community of scholars working on this new scientific topic, we examine authors citing two seminal papers and use network analysis to investigate the cognitive and organizational characteristics of the community of authors. Our findings suggest that the Economics of Science is still in the process of becoming an independent and cohesive field, exhibiting a highly fragmented structure. We also study the role of the ‘Workshop on the Organisation, Economics, and Policy of Scientific Research’ (WOEPS), initiated in 2007, for the Economics of Science community. We show that WOEPS presenters have more economists of science as coauthors and are better positioned to connect different clusters of authors in the wider Economics of Science network than other members of the network, highlighting its importance for linking scholars in the field. We also show that WOEPS papers are published in higher ‘quality’ journals, receive relatively more citations, and significantly more citations from within the Economics of Science field compared to other Economics of Science papers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2025.2571618
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a scientific community? The WOEPS workshop and the evolution of the economics of science, 1994–2023

Aldo Geuna, Cornelia Lawson, Daniel Souza
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
article

Building a scientific community? The WOEPS workshop and the evolution of the economics of science, 1994–2023

Aldo Geuna, Cornelia Lawson, Daniel Souza
article en

Abstract

The paper studies the development of the Economics of Science as a new emerging field in the social sciences during the period 1994–2023. To identify the community of scholars working on this new scientific topic, we examine authors citing two seminal papers and use network analysis to investigate the cognitive and organizational characteristics of the community of authors. Our findings suggest that the Economics of Science is still in the process of becoming an independent and cohesive field, exhibiting a highly fragmented structure. We also study the role of the ‘Workshop on the Organisation, Economics, and Policy of Scientific Research’ (WOEPS), initiated in 2007, for the Economics of Science community. We show that WOEPS presenters have more economists of science as coauthors and are better positioned to connect different clusters of authors in the wider Economics of Science network than other members of the network, highlighting its importance for linking scholars in the field. We also show that WOEPS papers are published in higher ‘quality’ journals, receive relatively more citations, and significantly more citations from within the Economics of Science field compared to other Economics of Science papers.

Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA), Collegio Carlo Alberto (IT), University of Manchester (GB), University of Turin (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.