Gully classification using spatially optimized PlanetScope data – a comparison of machine learning classifiers and spatial resampling techniques

Abstract Accurate classification of gullies is essential for effective land management, but identifying these linear erosional features from a coarser spatial resolution image can be challenging. Resampling the spatial resolution of readily available satellites, such as PlanetScope, which is freely accessible for educational and research purposes, can enhance pixel resolution and improve classification accuracy without incurring additional costs. However, this cost-effective approach has yet to be adopted in gully classification, where a finer level of detail is often necessary. This study explored the potential of a resampled PlanetScope product for improving gully classification. More precisely, it evaluated whether resampled imagery outperforms original-resolution imagery and identified the optimal combination of resampling techniques and machine learning classifiers for gully mapping. Four resampling techniques, such as the bilinear interpolation, cubic convolution, majority rule, and nearest neighbor, were applied and their effect on gully classification was assessed using three classifiers: support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting machine (GBM). Fifteen model variations, each defined by a unique combination of spatial resolution, resampling technique, and classifier, were developed and evaluated using an error matrix. Gully classification accuracy generally improved with cubic convolution and nearest neighbor resampling when using SVM and RF. In contrast, resampling did not improve classification accuracy with the GBM classifier. These findings demonstrate the potential of spatial resampling as a cost-effective strategy to enhance gully classification accuracy, particularly when applied with SVM and RF. However, the lack of improvement with GBM suggests that the effectiveness of resampling is classifier-dependent. Therefore, spatial resampling should be prioritized for gully mapping when using SVM and RF to maximize classification accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geomatics
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-025-00652-4
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gully classification using spatially optimized PlanetScope data – a comparison of machine learning classifiers and spatial resampling techniques

Kwanele Phinzi
Applied Geomatics
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

Gully classification using spatially optimized PlanetScope data – a comparison of machine learning classifiers and spatial resampling techniques

Kwanele Phinzi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate classification of gullies is essential for effective land management, but identifying these linear erosional features from a coarser spatial resolution image can be challenging. Resampling the spatial resolution of readily available satellites, such as PlanetScope, which is freely accessible for educational and research purposes, can enhance pixel resolution and improve classification accuracy without incurring additional costs. However, this cost-effective approach has yet to be adopted in gully classification, where a finer level of detail is often necessary. This study explored the potential of a resampled PlanetScope product for improving gully classification. More precisely, it evaluated whether resampled imagery outperforms original-resolution imagery and identified the optimal combination of resampling techniques and machine learning classifiers for gully mapping. Four resampling techniques, such as the bilinear interpolation, cubic convolution, majority rule, and nearest neighbor, were applied and their effect on gully classification was assessed using three classifiers: support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting machine (GBM). Fifteen model variations, each defined by a unique combination of spatial resolution, resampling technique, and classifier, were developed and evaluated using an error matrix. Gully classification accuracy generally improved with cubic convolution and nearest neighbor resampling when using SVM and RF. In contrast, resampling did not improve classification accuracy with the GBM classifier. These findings demonstrate the potential of spatial resampling as a cost-effective strategy to enhance gully classification accuracy, particularly when applied with SVM and RF. However, the lack of improvement with GBM suggests that the effectiveness of resampling is classifier-dependent. Therefore, spatial resampling should be prioritized for gully mapping when using SVM and RF to maximize classification accuracy.

Applied GeomaticsVol. 18(1)
University of Zululand (ZA)
University of Zululand
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gully classification using spatially optimized PlanetScope data – a comparison of machine learning classifiers and spatial resampling techniques — Kwanele Phinzi · Applied Geomatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS