The Transmission Chain of the <b> <i>Coranus Graecus</i> </b> (Vat. gr. 681)

Abstract The earliest Greek translation of the Qur’an is preserved only partially, mainly by way of an anti-Islamic polemic by Nicetas of Byzantium (9th/10th century CE) titled Refutation of the Qur’an . The text of this so-called Coranus Graecus does not, however, wholly conform to the Arabic reading of the Qur’an as transmitted by Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim. Since Nicetas’ work survives only in a single manuscript, Vat. gr. 681, these textual departures may have originated at multiple stages in the transmission history of the Coranus Graecus . The present paper aims to provide a systematic account of the textual differences between the Arabic Qur’an and its early Greek translation. It presents several case studies from the Coranus Graecus and discusses the possible origins of the divergences found in these instances. Four categories of textual variance are identified, namely modifications arising from: a qur’anic reading or readings diverging from Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim; the translation process as such; simple copying errors of the Greek text; and, finally, Nicetas’ tendentious use of the translation. On this basis, I propose a systematic categorization of the textual variants according to several stages of the transmission chain: Arabic base text, Greek translation, copying errors, and the translation’s use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Qur’anic Studies Association
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jiqsa-2024-0029
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Transmission Chain of the Coranus Graecus (Vat. gr. 681)

Manolis Ulbricht
Journal of the International Qur’anic Studies Association
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

The Transmission Chain of the Coranus Graecus (Vat. gr. 681)

Manolis Ulbricht
article en

Abstract

Abstract The earliest Greek translation of the Qur’an is preserved only partially, mainly by way of an anti-Islamic polemic by Nicetas of Byzantium (9th/10th century CE) titled Refutation of the Qur’an . The text of this so-called Coranus Graecus does not, however, wholly conform to the Arabic reading of the Qur’an as transmitted by Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim. Since Nicetas’ work survives only in a single manuscript, Vat. gr. 681, these textual departures may have originated at multiple stages in the transmission history of the Coranus Graecus . The present paper aims to provide a systematic account of the textual differences between the Arabic Qur’an and its early Greek translation. It presents several case studies from the Coranus Graecus and discusses the possible origins of the divergences found in these instances. Four categories of textual variance are identified, namely modifications arising from: a qur’anic reading or readings diverging from Ḥafṣ ʿan ʿĀṣim; the translation process as such; simple copying errors of the Greek text; and, finally, Nicetas’ tendentious use of the translation. On this basis, I propose a systematic categorization of the textual variants according to several stages of the transmission chain: Arabic base text, Greek translation, copying errors, and the translation’s use.

Journal of the International Qur’anic Studies AssociationVol. 10(1)
University of Notre Dame (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.