Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans
Drawing on this data, we argue that navigating ethical issues in cutting edge brain research requires a shift from focusing on promoting ethical guidelines to also promoting neuroethical competencies. More specifically, we argue that integrating the philosophical discipline of virtue ethics-which focuses on developing moral sensitivities, practical reasoning skills, and other ethical competencies-could provide better tools for addressing the ethical issues researchers face than regulations and rules alone. We conclude by suggesting two ways that neuroethicists and neuroscientists might move together towards a virtue ethical ideal: (i) promoting targeted neuroethics education and opportunities for participating in collective moral deliberation, and (ii) prioritizing engagement amongst researchers, ethicists, and study participants.
Authors
- Nader Pouratian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0426-3241)
- Ally Peabody Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-5358)
- Ashley Feinsinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0251-8810)
- Lilyana Levy
- Colleen Hanson
Institutions
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Lehigh University (US)
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Neurological Surgery (US)
- Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neuroethics
- Published
- 2025-10-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-025-09618-0
- Primary Topic
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institutes of Health