Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans

Drawing on this data, we argue that navigating ethical issues in cutting edge brain research requires a shift from focusing on promoting ethical guidelines to also promoting neuroethical competencies. More specifically, we argue that integrating the philosophical discipline of virtue ethics-which focuses on developing moral sensitivities, practical reasoning skills, and other ethical competencies-could provide better tools for addressing the ethical issues researchers face than regulations and rules alone. We conclude by suggesting two ways that neuroethicists and neuroscientists might move together towards a virtue ethical ideal: (i) promoting targeted neuroethics education and opportunities for participating in collective moral deliberation, and (ii) prioritizing engagement amongst researchers, ethicists, and study participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroethics
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-025-09618-0
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans

Nader Pouratian, Ally Peabody Smith, Ashley Feinsinger, Lilyana Levy et al.
Neuroethics
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans

Nader Pouratian, Ally Peabody Smith, Ashley Feinsinger, Lilyana Levy, Colleen Hanson
article en

Abstract

Drawing on this data, we argue that navigating ethical issues in cutting edge brain research requires a shift from focusing on promoting ethical guidelines to also promoting neuroethical competencies. More specifically, we argue that integrating the philosophical discipline of virtue ethics-which focuses on developing moral sensitivities, practical reasoning skills, and other ethical competencies-could provide better tools for addressing the ethical issues researchers face than regulations and rules alone. We conclude by suggesting two ways that neuroethicists and neuroscientists might move together towards a virtue ethical ideal: (i) promoting targeted neuroethics education and opportunities for participating in collective moral deliberation, and (ii) prioritizing engagement amongst researchers, ethicists, and study participants.

NeuroethicsVol. 18(3)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Lehigh University (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conflicting Interests and New Frontiers: A Role for Virtue Ethics in Cutting Edge Brain Research with Humans — Nader Pouratian, Ally Peabody Smith, et al. · Neuroethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS