Advanced machine learning models for predicting unconfined compressive strength from point load strength index of rock samples from Chennai and Bangalore

This study explores the effectiveness of point load tests (PLI), specifically both diametral (PLI<sub>d</sub>) and axial tests (PLI<sub>a</sub>), in forecasting various rock types' Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS). Additionally, it examines the implementation of Regression learner app with five machine learning (ML) models to enhance prediction accuracy. These models include Linear Regression, Stepwise Linear Regression, Support Vector Machine, Gaussian Process Regression, and Neural Network. The investigation focuses on rock samples sourced from Pallavaram in Chennai and Panathur in Bangalore. To ensure the reliability of the developed ML models and to assess the best predictive model, performance metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Coefficient of Correlation (R²) were employed for validation. The findings suggest that all tested models exhibited commendable performance correlating the parameters through the training and testing phases. Notably, the Neural Network and Gaussian Process Regression models surpassed the performance of the other methods, demonstrating their superior predictive capabilities. The study's results signify a robust correlation between PLI and the UCS of rocks sampled from Pallavaram and Panathur, indicating that the PLI can serve as a valuable metric for anticipating the UCS of rocks. Moreover, an analysis of the correlation across various models revealed that the PLI test performed in the axial direction shows a stronger relationship with UCS, yielding a Coefficient of Correlation (R²) of 0.996, in contrast to the diametral point load index which resulted in an R² of 0.991, applicable for both Pallavaram and Panathur rock samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20636-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced machine learning models for predicting unconfined compressive strength from point load strength index of rock samples from Chennai and Bangalore

M. Navaneethan, K. Premalatha, C. Venkata Siva Rama Prasad, Sowmya Kochukrishnan
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.86
article

Advanced machine learning models for predicting unconfined compressive strength from point load strength index of rock samples from Chennai and Bangalore

M. Navaneethan, K. Premalatha, C. Venkata Siva Rama Prasad, Sowmya Kochukrishnan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of point load tests (PLI), specifically both diametral (PLI<sub>d</sub>) and axial tests (PLI<sub>a</sub>), in forecasting various rock types' Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS). Additionally, it examines the implementation of Regression learner app with five machine learning (ML) models to enhance prediction accuracy. These models include Linear Regression, Stepwise Linear Regression, Support Vector Machine, Gaussian Process Regression, and Neural Network. The investigation focuses on rock samples sourced from Pallavaram in Chennai and Panathur in Bangalore. To ensure the reliability of the developed ML models and to assess the best predictive model, performance metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Coefficient of Correlation (R²) were employed for validation. The findings suggest that all tested models exhibited commendable performance correlating the parameters through the training and testing phases. Notably, the Neural Network and Gaussian Process Regression models surpassed the performance of the other methods, demonstrating their superior predictive capabilities. The study's results signify a robust correlation between PLI and the UCS of rocks sampled from Pallavaram and Panathur, indicating that the PLI can serve as a valuable metric for anticipating the UCS of rocks. Moreover, an analysis of the correlation across various models revealed that the PLI test performed in the axial direction shows a stronger relationship with UCS, yielding a Coefficient of Correlation (R²) of 0.996, in contrast to the diametral point load index which resulted in an R² of 0.991, applicable for both Pallavaram and Panathur rock samples.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Anna University, Chennai (IN), GEI Consultants (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.