Brief Form of Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (BANPS) – Polish adaptation

Objective This study aims to analyze the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the BANPS scale (Brief Form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales), assess the fit of its factor structure to the model proposed by Barrett and Robins, and evaluate the external validity of the scale based on its associations with Young’s theory of early maladaptive schemas.Method The study included 600 individuals between the ages of 18 and 66 (M = 28.28; SD = 9.99). Two questionnaires were used: the Brief Form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (BANPS) and the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-S3-PL).Results The results of the confirmatory analysis do not fully support the six-factor model of BANPS, with the fit indices ranging from good, through average and marginally acceptable, to poor. At the same time, Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients for all BANPS scales, except for the Care scale, reached satisfactory values (ranging from 0.724 to 0.869; 0.580 for the Care scale). Additionally, the associations between BANPS and YSQ-S3-PL are consistent with theoretical expectations.Conclusions The Polish version of the BANPS scale demonstrates psychometric properties comparable to those of other language versions, supporting its use as a research tool in scientific studies. At the same time, the authors emphasize the need for further research, including studies involving clinical populations and a broad range of psychometric indicators to facilitate comparisons across different versions of the instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2574959
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brief Form of Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (BANPS) – Polish adaptation

Łukasz Mokros, Małgorzata Juraś-Darowny, Monika Talarowska
Critical Public Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Brief Form of Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (BANPS) – Polish adaptation

Łukasz Mokros, Małgorzata Juraś-Darowny, Monika Talarowska
article en

Abstract

Objective This study aims to analyze the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the BANPS scale (Brief Form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales), assess the fit of its factor structure to the model proposed by Barrett and Robins, and evaluate the external validity of the scale based on its associations with Young’s theory of early maladaptive schemas.Method The study included 600 individuals between the ages of 18 and 66 (M = 28.28; SD = 9.99). Two questionnaires were used: the Brief Form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (BANPS) and the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-S3-PL).Results The results of the confirmatory analysis do not fully support the six-factor model of BANPS, with the fit indices ranging from good, through average and marginally acceptable, to poor. At the same time, Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients for all BANPS scales, except for the Care scale, reached satisfactory values (ranging from 0.724 to 0.869; 0.580 for the Care scale). Additionally, the associations between BANPS and YSQ-S3-PL are consistent with theoretical expectations.Conclusions The Polish version of the BANPS scale demonstrates psychometric properties comparable to those of other language versions, supporting its use as a research tool in scientific studies. At the same time, the authors emphasize the need for further research, including studies involving clinical populations and a broad range of psychometric indicators to facilitate comparisons across different versions of the instrument.

Critical Public HealthVol. 35(1)
Lodz University of Technology (PL), University of Łódź (PL), Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.