Neuro-fuzzy optimization of cutting tool geometry in machining using Sugeno and Mamdani inference models

Abstract This study presents the design and validation of zero-order Sugeno and Mamdani fuzzy inference systems applied to the estimation of optimal cutting tool angles in machining processes. The input variables considered were the tool destruction energy (D) and the material’s specific cutting energy (U), while the output variables corresponded to the clearance angle ( $$\alpha _{\text {n}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), rake angle ( $$\gamma _{\text {n}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), and cutting-edge inclination angle ( $$\lambda _{\text {s}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ). Based on a real dataset of 81 experimental values, a synthetic database of 118,300 records was generated using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) trained via the backpropagation algorithm, achieving a reliability level of 85%. Both models were implemented in MATLAB using Gaussian membership functions with nine rules per output variable. The Sugeno model employed constant outputs, whereas the Mamdani model used linguistic labels. Validation was performed through the calculation of the cutting-edge angle ( $$\beta _{\text {n}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), derived from $$\alpha $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:math> n and $$\gamma _{\text {n}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , by comparing the outputs of both systems. The normalized relative root mean square error (rMSE) was found to be below 6.5%, indicating a high level of agreement between the two models. The results demonstrate that fuzzy inference systems—particularly when integrated with neuro-fuzzy architectures like ANFIS—are effective tools for addressing geometric optimization problems in industrial environments characterized by uncertainty and complexity. It is concluded that this approach provides a robust and accurate alternative for computer-aided cutting tool design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-16742-x
Primary Topic
Advanced machining processes and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuro-fuzzy optimization of cutting tool geometry in machining using Sugeno and Mamdani inference models

Elena Merino-Gómez, Manuel San Juan Blanco, Luis Vicente-García, Francisco Santos-Martín
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Advanced machining processes and optimization
article

Neuro-fuzzy optimization of cutting tool geometry in machining using Sugeno and Mamdani inference models

Elena Merino-Gómez, Manuel San Juan Blanco, Luis Vicente-García, Francisco Santos-Martín
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study presents the design and validation of zero-order Sugeno and Mamdani fuzzy inference systems applied to the estimation of optimal cutting tool angles in machining processes. The input variables considered were the tool destruction energy (D) and the material’s specific cutting energy (U), while the output variables corresponded to the clearance angle ( $$\alpha _{\text {n}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), rake angle ( $$\gamma _{\text {n}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), and cutting-edge inclination angle ( $$\lambda _{\text {s}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ). Based on a real dataset of 81 experimental values, a synthetic database of 118,300 records was generated using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) trained via the backpropagation algorithm, achieving a reliability level of 85%. Both models were implemented in MATLAB using Gaussian membership functions with nine rules per output variable. The Sugeno model employed constant outputs, whereas the Mamdani model used linguistic labels. Validation was performed through the calculation of the cutting-edge angle ( $$\beta _{\text {n}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>β</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), derived from $$\alpha $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:math> n and $$\gamma _{\text {n}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , by comparing the outputs of both systems. The normalized relative root mean square error (rMSE) was found to be below 6.5%, indicating a high level of agreement between the two models. The results demonstrate that fuzzy inference systems—particularly when integrated with neuro-fuzzy architectures like ANFIS—are effective tools for addressing geometric optimization problems in industrial environments characterized by uncertainty and complexity. It is concluded that this approach provides a robust and accurate alternative for computer-aided cutting tool design.

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
Junta de Castilla y León
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Advanced machining processes and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.