Building and sustaining restorative community trust and engagement: the Co-Researcher Activation Network

After identifying substantial trust gaps between our university and neighboring community, we developed the Co-Researcher Activation Network (CRANE) to cultivate restorative engagement through ongoing transformational relationships. Informed by the Culture-Centered Approach, CRANE is a network of community member groups who identify local health concerns, develop research questions, and generate community-driven solutions. Organized by place rather than interest, groups are systematically created within geographic areas. The model focuses on engaging community members as “co-researchers,” whereby community members play an active role and share in the decision-making process through a collaborative and interdependent relationship with the research team. Using RE-AIM domains, we applied convergent mixed methods to test the effects of CRANE and to identify factors associated with fidelity and sustainability of the model. From 2022 to 2023, we convened 21 co-researchers in three groups that met bimonthly. Groups reflected age, racial/ethnic, economic, and educational diversity. Co-researchers’ perceptions of university researcher credibility (trustworthiness, expertise, and caring) significantly increased during the project. Five factors contributed to success: regular, audience-centered communication; small groups; gender segregation; scheduling flexibility; and community meeting spaces. Challenges included hiring issues, travel limits, low technology acceptance, transportation obstacles, and participant payment problems. CRANE is a blueprint for community engagement that honors community members and their expertise, strives for equitable partnership, and moves the needle on metrics of trust. The theoretically-grounded, co-researcher model can not only build but sustain restorative community trust and engagement. A co-researcher network that actively involved community members in decision-making throughout the course of research cultivated restorative trust and engagement through transformational relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Involvement and Engagement
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-00792-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building and sustaining restorative community trust and engagement: the Co-Researcher Activation Network

Samantha R. Jones, Jennifer L. Waller, Leslie E. Wolf, Frank Jackson et al.
1 citations
Research Involvement and Engagement
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.82
article

Building and sustaining restorative community trust and engagement: the Co-Researcher Activation Network

Samantha R. Jones, Jennifer L. Waller, Leslie E. Wolf, Frank Jackson, Nikeshia LaShaundra Lawson, Justin X. Moore, Christy J. W. Ledford, Lillie D. Williamson, Ebony B. Whisenant, Traci T Greene, Teena S Sidibe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

After identifying substantial trust gaps between our university and neighboring community, we developed the Co-Researcher Activation Network (CRANE) to cultivate restorative engagement through ongoing transformational relationships. Informed by the Culture-Centered Approach, CRANE is a network of community member groups who identify local health concerns, develop research questions, and generate community-driven solutions. Organized by place rather than interest, groups are systematically created within geographic areas. The model focuses on engaging community members as “co-researchers,” whereby community members play an active role and share in the decision-making process through a collaborative and interdependent relationship with the research team. Using RE-AIM domains, we applied convergent mixed methods to test the effects of CRANE and to identify factors associated with fidelity and sustainability of the model. From 2022 to 2023, we convened 21 co-researchers in three groups that met bimonthly. Groups reflected age, racial/ethnic, economic, and educational diversity. Co-researchers’ perceptions of university researcher credibility (trustworthiness, expertise, and caring) significantly increased during the project. Five factors contributed to success: regular, audience-centered communication; small groups; gender segregation; scheduling flexibility; and community meeting spaces. Challenges included hiring issues, travel limits, low technology acceptance, transportation obstacles, and participant payment problems. CRANE is a blueprint for community engagement that honors community members and their expertise, strives for equitable partnership, and moves the needle on metrics of trust. The theoretically-grounded, co-researcher model can not only build but sustain restorative community trust and engagement. A co-researcher network that actively involved community members in decision-making throughout the course of research cultivated restorative trust and engagement through transformational relationships.

Research Involvement and EngagementVol. 11(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Kentucky (US), Georgia State University (US), Augusta University (US), Research Network (United States) (US)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.