Modularity in transition: reconciling open building principles with early design education

Purpose This study explores how design strategies based on modular thinking intersect with the principles of open building movement (OBM), in early architectural education. It aims to assess the pedagogical value of OBM's adaptability-focused framework when applied in a studio environment. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative case study was conducted on 20 student projects developed in a second-year architecture studio focused on modular, reconfigurable residential units for temporary student use. The projects were evaluated through core OBM principles – support–infill distinction, user agency and adaptation – alongside selected ideas from the Metabolism movement. Student feedback and iterative reflections were incorporated to triangulate the analysis. Findings Students successfully engaged with OBM concepts, especially at the infill level, using modular strategies to enable personalization and post-occupancy adaptability. However, the standardized dimensions of the living modules and students’ limited experience in technical knowledge and detailing led to limitations such as structural rigidity, reduced facade flexibility and insufficient technical resolution in the projects. Social implications The study posits adaptability as a social necessity, advocating for architectural education that prepares students to create resilient, inclusive environments. It emphasizes how OBM principles can democratize design, enabling transient users to modify environments without expensive renovations – a vital approach for sustainable urbanization. Originality/value This paper distinctly connects the systemic modularity of Metabolism with the user-centric pragmatism of OBM, evaluating their joint significance as a pedagogical foundation in early architectural education. It enhances discussions on sustainable design by framing adaptability as an instructive competency that reconciles industrial discipline, ecological resilience and participatory equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open House International
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-02-2025-0083
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modularity in transition: reconciling open building principles with early design education

Bora Aldemir, Bora Yasin Özkuş
1 citations
Open House International
Architecture and Computational Design
9.49
article

Modularity in transition: reconciling open building principles with early design education

Bora Aldemir, Bora Yasin Özkuş
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study explores how design strategies based on modular thinking intersect with the principles of open building movement (OBM), in early architectural education. It aims to assess the pedagogical value of OBM's adaptability-focused framework when applied in a studio environment. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative case study was conducted on 20 student projects developed in a second-year architecture studio focused on modular, reconfigurable residential units for temporary student use. The projects were evaluated through core OBM principles – support–infill distinction, user agency and adaptation – alongside selected ideas from the Metabolism movement. Student feedback and iterative reflections were incorporated to triangulate the analysis. Findings Students successfully engaged with OBM concepts, especially at the infill level, using modular strategies to enable personalization and post-occupancy adaptability. However, the standardized dimensions of the living modules and students’ limited experience in technical knowledge and detailing led to limitations such as structural rigidity, reduced facade flexibility and insufficient technical resolution in the projects. Social implications The study posits adaptability as a social necessity, advocating for architectural education that prepares students to create resilient, inclusive environments. It emphasizes how OBM principles can democratize design, enabling transient users to modify environments without expensive renovations – a vital approach for sustainable urbanization. Originality/value This paper distinctly connects the systemic modularity of Metabolism with the user-centric pragmatism of OBM, evaluating their joint significance as a pedagogical foundation in early architectural education. It enhances discussions on sustainable design by framing adaptability as an instructive competency that reconciles industrial discipline, ecological resilience and participatory equity.

Open House InternationalVol. 51(1)
Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Architecture and Computational Design
9.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.