What would Labubu say about Luhmann? Fashion, systems, and struggles

This commentary critically engages Van de Peer and Laermans's article on fashion and systems theory. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann and Pierre Bourdieu, they propose a transversal sociology of fashion grounded in the in/out distinction. While their approach commendably elevates fashion beyond materialist and stratification frameworks, it risks reduction by collapsing diverse modalities into binary semantics. I argue instead for plural and trans-scalar logics of fashion – spanning science, art, industry, and everyday practice – and highlight dimensions neglected by systemic abstraction: affect, memory, sustainability, disciplinary politics, and decolonial critique. Fashion must be read not only as a system of distinctions but as a lived site of aspiration, exclusion, and struggle. Through three media/cultural cases – The Devil Wears Prada , Pose , and the global phenomenon of Labubu – I demonstrate both the explanatory power and the limits of systems theory, urging a general sociology of fashion that is plural, embodied, and porous to interdisciplinary insight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues in sociology.
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768667251387886
Primary Topic
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What would Labubu say about Luhmann? Fashion, systems, and struggles

Tommy Tse
Dialogues in sociology.
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
article

What would Labubu say about Luhmann? Fashion, systems, and struggles

Tommy Tse
article en

Abstract

This commentary critically engages Van de Peer and Laermans's article on fashion and systems theory. Drawing on Niklas Luhmann and Pierre Bourdieu, they propose a transversal sociology of fashion grounded in the in/out distinction. While their approach commendably elevates fashion beyond materialist and stratification frameworks, it risks reduction by collapsing diverse modalities into binary semantics. I argue instead for plural and trans-scalar logics of fashion – spanning science, art, industry, and everyday practice – and highlight dimensions neglected by systemic abstraction: affect, memory, sustainability, disciplinary politics, and decolonial critique. Fashion must be read not only as a system of distinctions but as a lived site of aspiration, exclusion, and struggle. Through three media/cultural cases – The Devil Wears Prada , Pose , and the global phenomenon of Labubu – I demonstrate both the explanatory power and the limits of systems theory, urging a general sociology of fashion that is plural, embodied, and porous to interdisciplinary insight.

Dialogues in sociology.Vol. 1(3)
University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Fashion and Cultural Textiles
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What would Labubu say about Luhmann? Fashion, systems, and struggles — Tommy Tse · Dialogues in sociology. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS