Not as special: The Court's decision on the risk of a breach of the Charter following surrender to the United Kingdom in Case C-202/24 <i>Alchaster</i>

This note examines the Court of Justice's ruling in the Alchaster case concerning judicial authorities’ assessment of the risk of a breach of fundamental rights following surrender to the United Kingdom. The Court of Justice denied the application of the principle of mutual trust to the surrender procedure established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, despite having applied the principle to the surrender agreement with Norway and Iceland. A ‘particular’ reason for the inapplicability of mutual trust is that the UK is not part of the ‘European area without internal borders’. Norway is part of that area by virtue of implementing the Schengen acquis and participating in the internal market through the EEA Agreement. The Court ruled that the UK does not have ‘as special’ a relationship with the EU as Norway does. Since the principle of mutual trust does not apply to the TCA surrender procedure, judicial authorities cannot use the two-step test from the Aranyosi and Căldăraru to determine if the Charter prevents surrender. Instead, judicial authorities must conduct an independent review following the Court’s approach in cases concerning extradition to third states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x251376884
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not as special: The Court's decision on the risk of a breach of the Charter following surrender to the United Kingdom in Case C-202/24 Alchaster

Sander Stokke
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
European and International Law Studies
article

Not as special: The Court's decision on the risk of a breach of the Charter following surrender to the United Kingdom in Case C-202/24 Alchaster

Sander Stokke
article en

Abstract

This note examines the Court of Justice's ruling in the Alchaster case concerning judicial authorities’ assessment of the risk of a breach of fundamental rights following surrender to the United Kingdom. The Court of Justice denied the application of the principle of mutual trust to the surrender procedure established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, despite having applied the principle to the surrender agreement with Norway and Iceland. A ‘particular’ reason for the inapplicability of mutual trust is that the UK is not part of the ‘European area without internal borders’. Norway is part of that area by virtue of implementing the Schengen acquis and participating in the internal market through the EEA Agreement. The Court ruled that the UK does not have ‘as special’ a relationship with the EU as Norway does. Since the principle of mutual trust does not apply to the TCA surrender procedure, judicial authorities cannot use the two-step test from the Aranyosi and Căldăraru to determine if the Charter prevents surrender. Instead, judicial authorities must conduct an independent review following the Court’s approach in cases concerning extradition to third states.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative LawVol. 32(5-6)
University of Oslo (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.