Assessment of Chinese local government disaster resilience based on the D-FAHP method

Previous studies on disaster resilience commonly employ the AHP and FAHP methods, but both exhibit limitations when expert evaluation information is incomplete or uncertain. To address this, this study adopts the D-FAHP method to assess the disaster resilience of sub-provincial municipal governments in China. Building on prior research and incorporating critical indicators identified through team fieldwork, we established an evaluation system with 4 criterion layer indicators and 19 scheme layer indicators.The D-FAHP method proves more applicable to complex evaluations under uncertain environments, enhancing the scientific rigor of indicator weight calculation in this study. By integrating indicator weights with expert panel assessments, we conducted a quantitative analysis and evaluation of the disaster resilience of the Qiannan Municipal Government. The comprehensive disaster resilience score reached 87.19, rated as "Good". Among the four phases, mitigation, preparedness, and recovery demonstrated strong performance, while the response phase requires further improvement. Overall, this study contributes to: (1) Enriching the disaster resilience evaluation indicator system, while empirically validating the critical importance of public disaster prevention education, public disaster response capacity training, crisis management resource reserves, and hazard avoidance-based land use planning; (2) Pioneering the application of the D-FAHP method, an innovative integration scarcely seen in existing disaster resilience assessment research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20706-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Chinese local government disaster resilience based on the D-FAHP method

Xin Guo, Zhijun Yang, Guobang Chen
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.95
article

Assessment of Chinese local government disaster resilience based on the D-FAHP method

Xin Guo, Zhijun Yang, Guobang Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Previous studies on disaster resilience commonly employ the AHP and FAHP methods, but both exhibit limitations when expert evaluation information is incomplete or uncertain. To address this, this study adopts the D-FAHP method to assess the disaster resilience of sub-provincial municipal governments in China. Building on prior research and incorporating critical indicators identified through team fieldwork, we established an evaluation system with 4 criterion layer indicators and 19 scheme layer indicators.The D-FAHP method proves more applicable to complex evaluations under uncertain environments, enhancing the scientific rigor of indicator weight calculation in this study. By integrating indicator weights with expert panel assessments, we conducted a quantitative analysis and evaluation of the disaster resilience of the Qiannan Municipal Government. The comprehensive disaster resilience score reached 87.19, rated as "Good". Among the four phases, mitigation, preparedness, and recovery demonstrated strong performance, while the response phase requires further improvement. Overall, this study contributes to: (1) Enriching the disaster resilience evaluation indicator system, while empirically validating the critical importance of public disaster prevention education, public disaster response capacity training, crisis management resource reserves, and hazard avoidance-based land use planning; (2) Pioneering the application of the D-FAHP method, an innovative integration scarcely seen in existing disaster resilience assessment research.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Guizhou University of Finance and Economics (CN), Nanning Normal University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.