A 10-Year Analysis of Resistance Training–Related Injuries Treated in Emergency Departments: Are Patterns Shifting With More Participation of Women Over Time?

Coffey, K, Pezzullo, L, Nixon, RM, Bolling, J, and Vincent, HK. A 10-year analysis of resistance training-related injuries treated in emergency departments: Are patterns shifting with more participation of women over time? J Strength Cond Res 40(1): e1-e8, 2026-This study reports current sex-related injury patterns associated with resistance training-related data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). This retrospective study includes patients seeking care for "resistance training" activity as defined by NEISS, encompassing the use of weight machines, barbells, dumbbells, and kettlebells. The prevalence, type and anatomical site of injuries, and hospital outcome were compared by sex. In total, 15,348 cases were included (20.40% female; 22.8 ± 6.3 years). Females sought care more frequently than males for accidental injuries including fracture (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27 [1.11-1.46]), contusion/laceration (OR = 1.52 [1.37-1.69]) and concussion/internal injuries (OR = 2.45 [2.02-2.97]). Males had 20 and 35% greater odds for reporting to the emergency department (ED) for exertional sprains/strains and dislocations, respectively (both p <0.05). Sites more frequently treated in the ED for females were the head, leg, and ankle/foot (all p < 0.050). The trunk was the most commonly injured site for both males and females (40.5 and 31.1%, respectively). Males had more crush injuries (3.10 vs. 2.20%, respectively) and injuries related to pressing movement (7.20 vs. 3.30%, respectively; p < 0.050). Females had more injuries related to dropped equipment (18.50 vs. 12.10%, respectively), falls (8.30 vs. 5.60%, respectively), and being hit by equipment (6.1 vs. 4.10%, respectively) than males ( p < 0.050). Gym environments were the most common injury sites for both sexes. Compared with earlier NEISS data, persistent sex differences exist with injury presentation in the ED, with an increase in concussions/internal injuries in females. Appropriate training regarding set-up and lift execution is critical to minimize these injuries. Prospective tracking that links specific type of lifting activity with specific injuries may provide a better understanding of how to reduce or prevent injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005268
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A 10-Year Analysis of Resistance Training–Related Injuries Treated in Emergency Departments: Are Patterns Shifting With More Participation of Women Over Time?

Lynne Pezzullo, Jamie Bolling, Heather K. Vincent, Ryan M. Nixon et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports injuries and prevention
article

A 10-Year Analysis of Resistance Training–Related Injuries Treated in Emergency Departments: Are Patterns Shifting With More Participation of Women Over Time?

Lynne Pezzullo, Jamie Bolling, Heather K. Vincent, Ryan M. Nixon, Kyle Coffey
article en

Abstract

Coffey, K, Pezzullo, L, Nixon, RM, Bolling, J, and Vincent, HK. A 10-year analysis of resistance training-related injuries treated in emergency departments: Are patterns shifting with more participation of women over time? J Strength Cond Res 40(1): e1-e8, 2026-This study reports current sex-related injury patterns associated with resistance training-related data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). This retrospective study includes patients seeking care for "resistance training" activity as defined by NEISS, encompassing the use of weight machines, barbells, dumbbells, and kettlebells. The prevalence, type and anatomical site of injuries, and hospital outcome were compared by sex. In total, 15,348 cases were included (20.40% female; 22.8 ± 6.3 years). Females sought care more frequently than males for accidental injuries including fracture (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27 [1.11-1.46]), contusion/laceration (OR = 1.52 [1.37-1.69]) and concussion/internal injuries (OR = 2.45 [2.02-2.97]). Males had 20 and 35% greater odds for reporting to the emergency department (ED) for exertional sprains/strains and dislocations, respectively (both p <0.05). Sites more frequently treated in the ED for females were the head, leg, and ankle/foot (all p < 0.050). The trunk was the most commonly injured site for both males and females (40.5 and 31.1%, respectively). Males had more crush injuries (3.10 vs. 2.20%, respectively) and injuries related to pressing movement (7.20 vs. 3.30%, respectively; p < 0.050). Females had more injuries related to dropped equipment (18.50 vs. 12.10%, respectively), falls (8.30 vs. 5.60%, respectively), and being hit by equipment (6.1 vs. 4.10%, respectively) than males ( p < 0.050). Gym environments were the most common injury sites for both sexes. Compared with earlier NEISS data, persistent sex differences exist with injury presentation in the ED, with an increase in concussions/internal injuries in females. Appropriate training regarding set-up and lift execution is critical to minimize these injuries. Prospective tracking that links specific type of lifting activity with specific injuries may provide a better understanding of how to reduce or prevent injuries.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 40(1)
University of Florida (US), Florida College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.