Critical environmental communication framework

This study develops a Critical Environmental Communication (CEC) framework to assess the landscape of Environmental Communication research and to what extent and in which ways critical and justice-oriented perspectives are included. The CEC framework consists of four interconnected themes: (a) Marginalized Ecocultural Identities, (b) Context and Scale, (c) Power and Agency, and (d) Justice, Equity, Diversity, Access, and Inclusion (JEDAI). Using this framework in a bibliometric analysis examining 1,297 Environmental Communication publications, we assess the occurrence of these themes in the scholarship. Our analysis found that Marginalized Ecocultural Identities, and Context and Scale were most frequently occurring, while Power and Agency, and JEDAI occurred less frequently. These findings suggest research directions to create a more inclusive research agenda for Environmental Communication scholarship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Communication
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2025.2564675
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical environmental communication framework

Bruno Takahashi, Silje Kristiansen, Andrea M. Feldpausch‐Parker, Shumaila Bhatti et al.
2 citations
Review of Communication
Construction Project Management and Performance
4.21
article

Critical environmental communication framework

Bruno Takahashi, Silje Kristiansen, Andrea M. Feldpausch‐Parker, Shumaila Bhatti, Srividya Ramasubramanian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study develops a Critical Environmental Communication (CEC) framework to assess the landscape of Environmental Communication research and to what extent and in which ways critical and justice-oriented perspectives are included. The CEC framework consists of four interconnected themes: (a) Marginalized Ecocultural Identities, (b) Context and Scale, (c) Power and Agency, and (d) Justice, Equity, Diversity, Access, and Inclusion (JEDAI). Using this framework in a bibliometric analysis examining 1,297 Environmental Communication publications, we assess the occurrence of these themes in the scholarship. Our analysis found that Marginalized Ecocultural Identities, and Context and Scale were most frequently occurring, while Power and Agency, and JEDAI occurred less frequently. These findings suggest research directions to create a more inclusive research agenda for Environmental Communication scholarship.

Review of Communication
Purchase College (US), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US), Office of International Affairs (US), University of Bergen (NO), Syracuse University (US), Virginia Tech (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Construction Project Management and Performance
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical environmental communication framework — Bruno Takahashi, Silje Kristiansen, et al. · Review of Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS