Critical environmental communication framework
This study develops a Critical Environmental Communication (CEC) framework to assess the landscape of Environmental Communication research and to what extent and in which ways critical and justice-oriented perspectives are included. The CEC framework consists of four interconnected themes: (a) Marginalized Ecocultural Identities, (b) Context and Scale, (c) Power and Agency, and (d) Justice, Equity, Diversity, Access, and Inclusion (JEDAI). Using this framework in a bibliometric analysis examining 1,297 Environmental Communication publications, we assess the occurrence of these themes in the scholarship. Our analysis found that Marginalized Ecocultural Identities, and Context and Scale were most frequently occurring, while Power and Agency, and JEDAI occurred less frequently. These findings suggest research directions to create a more inclusive research agenda for Environmental Communication scholarship.
Authors
- Bruno Takahashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-4925)
- Silje Kristiansen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5739-7764)
- Andrea M. Feldpausch‐Parker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-4762)
- Shumaila Bhatti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2056-5194)
- Srividya Ramasubramanian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2140-8008)
Institutions
- Purchase College (US)
- SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US)
- Office of International Affairs (US)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Syracuse University (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Review of Communication
- Published
- 2025-10-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2025.2564675
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Construction Project Management and Performance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.21