Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Bicortical Screw Versus Plate Fixation in Jones Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal Using 3D-Printed Models

<b>Background:</b> Jones fractures of the 5th metatarsal are frequently associated with nonunion due to limited vascularization and repetitive mechanical stress. The aim of the study was to compare the biomechanical performance of T-plate and bicortical screw fixation using standardized 3D models. <b>Methods:</b> Three-dimensional models of the 5th metatarsal were generated from CT images and printed using PolyJet technology (Stratasys J5 DentaJet) using a rigid-elastic composite with properties similar to cortical and cancellous bone. Jones fractures were fixed with either a locked T-plate or a bicortical screw. The samples were tested under axial and oblique static loads (α = 0°, 90°, 180°) and for three values of interfragmentary distance (d = 0.1-1 mm), in a 3 × 2 factorial design. <b>Results:</b> The T-plate fixation recorded a maximum yield force (Fmax) of 149.78 ± 8.53 N (138-161 N), significantly higher compared to the bicortical screw -98.56 ± 2.58 N (96-101 N), (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The ductility index was higher for the plate, indicating a progressive transition to yield. The α and d factors significantly influenced the mechanical behavior, with the polynomial model explaining over 95% of the total variation. <b>Discussion:</b> The plate fixation demonstrated greater strength and superior biomechanical tolerance in imperfect reduction scenarios. The main limitation is the lack of fatigue testing and the inability of 3D models to reproduce the structural heterogeneity of human bone. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implant selection should be individualized based on fracture stability. 3D models provide a reproducible platform for comparative evaluation of osteosynthesis methods, but future studies should include cyclic loading and biological validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207449
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Bicortical Screw Versus Plate Fixation in Jones Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal Using 3D-Printed Models

Marius Moga, Robert Daniel Dobrotă, Dumitru Ferechide, Mark Edward Pogarasteanu et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
2.02
article

Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Bicortical Screw Versus Plate Fixation in Jones Fractures of the Fifth Metatarsal Using 3D-Printed Models

Marius Moga, Robert Daniel Dobrotă, Dumitru Ferechide, Mark Edward Pogarasteanu, Ioana Codruta Lebada
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Jones fractures of the 5th metatarsal are frequently associated with nonunion due to limited vascularization and repetitive mechanical stress. The aim of the study was to compare the biomechanical performance of T-plate and bicortical screw fixation using standardized 3D models. <b>Methods:</b> Three-dimensional models of the 5th metatarsal were generated from CT images and printed using PolyJet technology (Stratasys J5 DentaJet) using a rigid-elastic composite with properties similar to cortical and cancellous bone. Jones fractures were fixed with either a locked T-plate or a bicortical screw. The samples were tested under axial and oblique static loads (α = 0°, 90°, 180°) and for three values of interfragmentary distance (d = 0.1-1 mm), in a 3 × 2 factorial design. <b>Results:</b> The T-plate fixation recorded a maximum yield force (Fmax) of 149.78 ± 8.53 N (138-161 N), significantly higher compared to the bicortical screw -98.56 ± 2.58 N (96-101 N), (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The ductility index was higher for the plate, indicating a progressive transition to yield. The α and d factors significantly influenced the mechanical behavior, with the polynomial model explaining over 95% of the total variation. <b>Discussion:</b> The plate fixation demonstrated greater strength and superior biomechanical tolerance in imperfect reduction scenarios. The main limitation is the lack of fatigue testing and the inability of 3D models to reproduce the structural heterogeneity of human bone. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implant selection should be individualized based on fracture stability. 3D models provide a reproducible platform for comparative evaluation of osteosynthesis methods, but future studies should include cyclic loading and biological validation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(20)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO), Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.