Safety Risk Evaluation of Water and Mud Inrush in Karst Tunnel Based on an Improved Weighted Cloud Model

Frequent water and mud inrush accidents during karst tunnel construction severely impact tunnel construction safety, environmental sustainability, and the long-term use of infrastructure. Therefore, conducting practical risk assessment for karst tunnel water and mud inrush is crucial for promoting sustainable practices in tunnel engineering, as it can mitigate catastrophic events that lead to resource waste, ecological damage, and economic loss. This paper establishes an improved weighted cloud model for karst tunnel water and mud inrush risk to evaluate the associated risk factors. The calculation of subjective weight for risk metrics adopts the ordinal relationship method (G1 method), which is a subjective weighting method improved from the analytic hierarchy process. The calculation of objective weight employs the improved entropy weight method, which is superior to the traditional entropy weight method by effectively preventing calculation distortion. Game theory is applied to calculate the optimal weight combination coefficient for two computational methods, and cloud model theory is finally introduced to reduce the fuzziness of the membership interval during the assessment process. This study applied the established risk assessment model to five sections of the Furong Tunnel and Cushishan Tunnel in Southwest China. The final risk ratings for these sections were determined as “High Risk,” “High Risk,” “Medium Risk,” “High Risk,” and “Moderate Risk”, respectively. These results align with the findings from field investigations, validating the effectiveness and reliability of the cloud model-based mud and water outburst risk assessment using combined weighting. Compared to traditional methods such as fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and entropy weighting, the evaluation results from this study’s model demonstrate higher similarity and reliability. This provides a foundation for assessing mud and water outburst hazards and other tunnel disasters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209328
Primary Topic
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety Risk Evaluation of Water and Mud Inrush in Karst Tunnel Based on an Improved Weighted Cloud Model

Z. X. Li, Baofu Duan, Anni Chu, Liankai Bu et al.
Sustainability
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
article

Safety Risk Evaluation of Water and Mud Inrush in Karst Tunnel Based on an Improved Weighted Cloud Model

Z. X. Li, Baofu Duan, Anni Chu, Liankai Bu, Keahiahi Long
article en

Abstract

Frequent water and mud inrush accidents during karst tunnel construction severely impact tunnel construction safety, environmental sustainability, and the long-term use of infrastructure. Therefore, conducting practical risk assessment for karst tunnel water and mud inrush is crucial for promoting sustainable practices in tunnel engineering, as it can mitigate catastrophic events that lead to resource waste, ecological damage, and economic loss. This paper establishes an improved weighted cloud model for karst tunnel water and mud inrush risk to evaluate the associated risk factors. The calculation of subjective weight for risk metrics adopts the ordinal relationship method (G1 method), which is a subjective weighting method improved from the analytic hierarchy process. The calculation of objective weight employs the improved entropy weight method, which is superior to the traditional entropy weight method by effectively preventing calculation distortion. Game theory is applied to calculate the optimal weight combination coefficient for two computational methods, and cloud model theory is finally introduced to reduce the fuzziness of the membership interval during the assessment process. This study applied the established risk assessment model to five sections of the Furong Tunnel and Cushishan Tunnel in Southwest China. The final risk ratings for these sections were determined as “High Risk,” “High Risk,” “Medium Risk,” “High Risk,” and “Moderate Risk”, respectively. These results align with the findings from field investigations, validating the effectiveness and reliability of the cloud model-based mud and water outburst risk assessment using combined weighting. Compared to traditional methods such as fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and entropy weighting, the evaluation results from this study’s model demonstrate higher similarity and reliability. This provides a foundation for assessing mud and water outburst hazards and other tunnel disasters.

SustainabilityVol. 17(20)
Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safety Risk Evaluation of Water and Mud Inrush in Karst Tunnel Based on an Improved Weighted Cloud Model — Z. X. Li, Baofu Duan, et al. · Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS