Locked in on RFNBOs – Will EU mandates for drop-in synthetic aviation fuels lead to decreased energy- and cost-efficiency?

• Comparison of methanol synthesis based on combustion or gasification of biomass. • Gasification outperforms combustion options in terms of cost and energy efficiency. • Policies requiring CO 2 -based fuel synthesis create lock-in in sub-optimal system. • RFNBO rules are in conflict with energy efficiency directive and waste hierarchy. • Regulatory inconsistency increases investment risk that could slow down deployment. Decarbonization of the transportation sector implies that fossil fuels must be substituted with sustainable alternatives. Current EU policies incentivize large-scale deployment of synthetic aviation fuel production that can be classified as Renewable Fuel of Non-Biological Origin (RFNBO). Synthetic aviation fuel can be produced from methanol and this work presents a techno-economic assessment of three pathways (two combustion-based and one gasification-based) to produce synthetic methanol from biomass residues and renewable hydrogen. The results show that the gasification-based pathway can produce methanol at a lower cost (820 €/t methanol) and higher energy efficiency (46 %, for conversion of biomass, electricity and heat inputs to methanol) compared to combustion-based options (1,050–1,500 €/t methanol and ∼37 % efficiency). The gasifier route requires less renewable hydrogen, resulting in a 30 % lower electricity demand. However, only 55 % of the gasification-based methanol is compliant with the RFNBO definition, since the regulation stipulates that biofuel cannot be counted towards the drop-in quotas. Furthermore, the findings indicate that RFNBO policies that favor production using CO 2 from combustion processes that supply energy to utility systems (e.g., district heating) risk leading to lock-in in inefficient systems, as electrification of heat supply could be a more efficient option. This work identifies such regulatory inconsistencies that increase risk related to investment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137181
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locked in on RFNBOs – Will EU mandates for drop-in synthetic aviation fuels lead to decreased energy- and cost-efficiency?

Henrik Thunman, Johanna Beiron, Simon Harvey
1 citations
Fuel
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
1.11
article

Locked in on RFNBOs – Will EU mandates for drop-in synthetic aviation fuels lead to decreased energy- and cost-efficiency?

Henrik Thunman, Johanna Beiron, Simon Harvey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Comparison of methanol synthesis based on combustion or gasification of biomass. • Gasification outperforms combustion options in terms of cost and energy efficiency. • Policies requiring CO 2 -based fuel synthesis create lock-in in sub-optimal system. • RFNBO rules are in conflict with energy efficiency directive and waste hierarchy. • Regulatory inconsistency increases investment risk that could slow down deployment. Decarbonization of the transportation sector implies that fossil fuels must be substituted with sustainable alternatives. Current EU policies incentivize large-scale deployment of synthetic aviation fuel production that can be classified as Renewable Fuel of Non-Biological Origin (RFNBO). Synthetic aviation fuel can be produced from methanol and this work presents a techno-economic assessment of three pathways (two combustion-based and one gasification-based) to produce synthetic methanol from biomass residues and renewable hydrogen. The results show that the gasification-based pathway can produce methanol at a lower cost (820 €/t methanol) and higher energy efficiency (46 %, for conversion of biomass, electricity and heat inputs to methanol) compared to combustion-based options (1,050–1,500 €/t methanol and ∼37 % efficiency). The gasifier route requires less renewable hydrogen, resulting in a 30 % lower electricity demand. However, only 55 % of the gasification-based methanol is compliant with the RFNBO definition, since the regulation stipulates that biofuel cannot be counted towards the drop-in quotas. Furthermore, the findings indicate that RFNBO policies that favor production using CO 2 from combustion processes that supply energy to utility systems (e.g., district heating) risk leading to lock-in in inefficient systems, as electrification of heat supply could be a more efficient option. This work identifies such regulatory inconsistencies that increase risk related to investment decisions.

FuelVol. 406
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.