Disembodying CEO leadership through AI-assisted speechwriting

This paper examines the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to generate a speech for the CEO of a hypothetical publicly traded coal mining company, intended to be delivered at that company’s annual general meeting. Using ChatGPT , we prompt this Large Language Model (LLM) to generate the CEO’s speech. We then analyze the speech using close reading, highlighting important language features, critical ethical considerations, and broader implications of AI-driven speechwriting for corporate leadership. By exploring four language features of the speech (metaphor, semantic tone, pronoun use, and readability) we find that the language pattern of the ChatGPT speech closely mirrors that of a speech prepared by an authentic human leader, inasmuch as it was customized to the controversial topic, the audience and setting, and possessed many “human-like” linguistic features. We highlight ethical concerns about the role of AI in leadership discourse and demonstrate the potential of AI to disembody executive authority. If AI’s contribution to speechwriting is not acknowledged transparently, CEO communication risks becoming a leadership charade. Any decision to use AI as a speechwriter should be reached after weighing the efficiency and convenience of doing so, against the potential erosion of authenticity in leadership communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Possibility Studies & Society
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699251374119
Primary Topic
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disembodying CEO leadership through AI-assisted speechwriting

Russell Craig, Joel Amernic
Possibility Studies & Society
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
article

Disembodying CEO leadership through AI-assisted speechwriting

Russell Craig, Joel Amernic
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to generate a speech for the CEO of a hypothetical publicly traded coal mining company, intended to be delivered at that company’s annual general meeting. Using ChatGPT , we prompt this Large Language Model (LLM) to generate the CEO’s speech. We then analyze the speech using close reading, highlighting important language features, critical ethical considerations, and broader implications of AI-driven speechwriting for corporate leadership. By exploring four language features of the speech (metaphor, semantic tone, pronoun use, and readability) we find that the language pattern of the ChatGPT speech closely mirrors that of a speech prepared by an authentic human leader, inasmuch as it was customized to the controversial topic, the audience and setting, and possessed many “human-like” linguistic features. We highlight ethical concerns about the role of AI in leadership discourse and demonstrate the potential of AI to disembody executive authority. If AI’s contribution to speechwriting is not acknowledged transparently, CEO communication risks becoming a leadership charade. Any decision to use AI as a speechwriter should be reached after weighing the efficiency and convenience of doing so, against the potential erosion of authenticity in leadership communication.

Possibility Studies & Society
University of Toronto (CA), University of Canterbury (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disembodying CEO leadership through AI-assisted speechwriting — Russell Craig, Joel Amernic · Possibility Studies & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS