Healthcare leaders and professionals’ perspectives of the ICON programme to prevent abusive head trauma in infants: a qualitative study

Staff are willing and able to deliver the ICON programme, including, where necessary, delivering the key messages in a format acceptable to families varying situations, if given the workload and training to do so. Those in leadership positions influence the likelihood of successful adoption, delivery and longer-term mainstreaming, if they are able to prioritise the programme. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to ICON's delivery has the potential to inform policy by facilitating the uptake of the programme by settings, enabling delivery of ICON to reach the needs of local families, and ensuring sustainability of the ICON programme.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24682-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare leaders and professionals’ perspectives of the ICON programme to prevent abusive head trauma in infants: a qualitative study

Joni Jackson, Julie Mytton, Carlos Sillero‐Rejon, Jelena Savović et al.
1 citations
BMC Public Health
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
3.49
article

Healthcare leaders and professionals’ perspectives of the ICON programme to prevent abusive head trauma in infants: a qualitative study

Joni Jackson, Julie Mytton, Carlos Sillero‐Rejon, Jelena Savović, Maria Barnes, Mark D Lyttle, Maria Theresa Redaniel, Hugh McLeod, Julie M. Brose
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Staff are willing and able to deliver the ICON programme, including, where necessary, delivering the key messages in a format acceptable to families varying situations, if given the workload and training to do so. Those in leadership positions influence the likelihood of successful adoption, delivery and longer-term mainstreaming, if they are able to prioritise the programme. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to ICON's delivery has the potential to inform policy by facilitating the uptake of the programme by settings, enabling delivery of ICON to reach the needs of local families, and ensuring sustainability of the ICON programme.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
University of the West of England (GB), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), At Bristol (GB), Bristol Royal Hospital for Children (GB), University of Bristol (GB), National Cancer Registry (IE), Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science (AU)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
3.49
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Healthcare leaders and professionals’ perspectives of the ICON programme to prevent abusive head trauma in infants: a qualitative study — Joni Jackson, Julie Mytton, et al. · BMC Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS