Monitoring and Assessing EPR Compliance of Producers and Importers To Prevent Free Riders in Developing Countries: the Case of Vietnam

Abstract Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) represents a critical policy instrument for enhancing waste management systems. While Vietnam has initiated a transition from a discretionary to a mandatory EPR framework, significant challenges persist in the effective monitoring and evaluation of compliance by producers and importers; therefore, this study seeks to develop strategic policy recommendations aimed at strengthening regulatory oversight and mitigating free rider behaviour (when individuals benefit from a good or service without contributing to its cost). By using a multimethod approach that combines desk review and focus group discussions to ensure both document-based and stakeholder-informed insights, the research identifies six key strategies to address non-compliance: cross-checking of data, mandatory registration, periodic and random inspections, enforcement of penalties, public disclosure of EPR-related information, and third-party audits. Moreover, the study delineates four fundamental considerations for conducting EPR inspections: the reliability and availability of data, the level of cooperation from obligated companies, the institutional capacity of inspection authorities, and the risks associated with corruption and lack of accountability among enforcement personnel. Furthermore, to support the inspection process, five practical tools are proposed: a standardized reporting form, a violation report form, a documentary checklist for preparatory review, an on-site inspection checklist, and an inspection reporting template. Finally, the study introduces a conceptual framework for assessing EPR compliance among obligated enterprises. These recommendations are intended to inform policy and regulatory development, thereby contributing to a more accountable, transparent, and effective EPR implementation in Vietnam.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-025-00703-3
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring and Assessing EPR Compliance of Producers and Importers To Prevent Free Riders in Developing Countries: the Case of Vietnam

Dinh Linh Le, Prasad Kaparaju, Sunil Herat, Thi Yen Anh Tran et al.
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
article

Monitoring and Assessing EPR Compliance of Producers and Importers To Prevent Free Riders in Developing Countries: the Case of Vietnam

Dinh Linh Le, Prasad Kaparaju, Sunil Herat, Thi Yen Anh Tran, Thi Xuan Son Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) represents a critical policy instrument for enhancing waste management systems. While Vietnam has initiated a transition from a discretionary to a mandatory EPR framework, significant challenges persist in the effective monitoring and evaluation of compliance by producers and importers; therefore, this study seeks to develop strategic policy recommendations aimed at strengthening regulatory oversight and mitigating free rider behaviour (when individuals benefit from a good or service without contributing to its cost). By using a multimethod approach that combines desk review and focus group discussions to ensure both document-based and stakeholder-informed insights, the research identifies six key strategies to address non-compliance: cross-checking of data, mandatory registration, periodic and random inspections, enforcement of penalties, public disclosure of EPR-related information, and third-party audits. Moreover, the study delineates four fundamental considerations for conducting EPR inspections: the reliability and availability of data, the level of cooperation from obligated companies, the institutional capacity of inspection authorities, and the risks associated with corruption and lack of accountability among enforcement personnel. Furthermore, to support the inspection process, five practical tools are proposed: a standardized reporting form, a violation report form, a documentary checklist for preparatory review, an on-site inspection checklist, and an inspection reporting template. Finally, the study introduces a conceptual framework for assessing EPR compliance among obligated enterprises. These recommendations are intended to inform policy and regulatory development, thereby contributing to a more accountable, transparent, and effective EPR implementation in Vietnam.

Circular Economy and SustainabilityVol. 5(7)
Griffith University (AU), Hanoi University of Civil Engineering (VN), University of Da Nang (VN), Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment (VN)
Griffith University, Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.