Lead-Free Alternatives for Radiation Shielding in Medical Environments: A Comprehensive Review

In radiography, effective radiation shielding is crucial to ensure the safety of patients, medical staff, and the public. Traditionally, lead has been the primary shielding material due to its high atomic number and density, which provide efficient radiation attenuation. However, lead presents several challenges, including significant weight, toxicity, long-term health risks, and serious environmental concerns. Lead waste is classified as hazardous due to its non-biodegradable nature, potential for soil and water contamination, and difficulties associated with safe disposal and recycling processes. These issues have driven the search for safer and more sustainable alternatives. Recent advancements have led to the development of lead-free shielding materials designed to replace conventional lead-based shields. Among these, lead-free multilayered polymer composites have emerged as promising substitutes, often enhanced with elements such as bismuth, tungsten, barium, tin, cadmium, gadolinium, antimony, and molybdenum to improve their radiation protection capabilities. This study examines the potential of these alternatives to address the limitations of traditional lead shielding, with a particular focus on their development and application in medical settings. By reducing toxicity, lowering weight, and improving recyclability, these materials offer a more environmentally friendly and health-conscious approach to radiation protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sakarya University Journal of Science
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1735274
Primary Topic
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lead-Free Alternatives for Radiation Shielding in Medical Environments: A Comprehensive Review

Khalid Hani Abushahla, Halil Arslan
Sakarya University Journal of Science
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
article

Lead-Free Alternatives for Radiation Shielding in Medical Environments: A Comprehensive Review

Khalid Hani Abushahla, Halil Arslan
article en

Abstract

In radiography, effective radiation shielding is crucial to ensure the safety of patients, medical staff, and the public. Traditionally, lead has been the primary shielding material due to its high atomic number and density, which provide efficient radiation attenuation. However, lead presents several challenges, including significant weight, toxicity, long-term health risks, and serious environmental concerns. Lead waste is classified as hazardous due to its non-biodegradable nature, potential for soil and water contamination, and difficulties associated with safe disposal and recycling processes. These issues have driven the search for safer and more sustainable alternatives. Recent advancements have led to the development of lead-free shielding materials designed to replace conventional lead-based shields. Among these, lead-free multilayered polymer composites have emerged as promising substitutes, often enhanced with elements such as bismuth, tungsten, barium, tin, cadmium, gadolinium, antimony, and molybdenum to improve their radiation protection capabilities. This study examines the potential of these alternatives to address the limitations of traditional lead shielding, with a particular focus on their development and application in medical settings. By reducing toxicity, lowering weight, and improving recyclability, these materials offer a more environmentally friendly and health-conscious approach to radiation protection.

Sakarya University Journal of ScienceVol. 29(5)
Sakarya University (TR), Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.