Breaking in or breaking through? How local specialisations shape the integration of AI technologies

Amid global investments in Artificial Intelligence (AI), understanding how this technology is successfully integrated into national innovation systems is a critical challenge. We analyse global patent data (1974–2018) for the world’s leading AI economies (China, Japan, South Korea, and the USA), introducing a novel method to distinguish between two national integration pathways: ‘break-in’ trajectories, where AI is anchored to a country’s existing knowledge base, and ‘break-through’ trajectories, where countries follow global technology patterns independently of domestic knowledge bases. Our findings reveal that durable AI leadership emerges overwhelmingly from ‘break-in’ patterns, where AI specialisations persist by aligning with broader national capabilities. This suggests that the dominant integration mechanism is strategic anchoring: a process where a new technology is adapted and hybridised with existing industrial structures. We argue that AI acts as a ‘recombinant bridge’, enabling this hybridisation and creating multiple entry points for national deployment. These findings imply that effective AI policy requires a ‘smart specialisation’-like approach. The goal should be to foster a symbiotic ecosystem that fuses core AI skills with unique industrial strengths through strategic anchoring. This, however, may lead to the rise of ‘hybrid giants’ that dominate multiple sectors, presenting a new frontier of regulatory and geopolitical challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2025.2558626
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking in or breaking through? How local specialisations shape the integration of AI technologies

Björn Jindra, Daniel S. Hain, Matheus Eduardo Leusin
1 citations
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Economic and Technological Innovation
3.13
article

Breaking in or breaking through? How local specialisations shape the integration of AI technologies

Björn Jindra, Daniel S. Hain, Matheus Eduardo Leusin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Amid global investments in Artificial Intelligence (AI), understanding how this technology is successfully integrated into national innovation systems is a critical challenge. We analyse global patent data (1974–2018) for the world’s leading AI economies (China, Japan, South Korea, and the USA), introducing a novel method to distinguish between two national integration pathways: ‘break-in’ trajectories, where AI is anchored to a country’s existing knowledge base, and ‘break-through’ trajectories, where countries follow global technology patterns independently of domestic knowledge bases. Our findings reveal that durable AI leadership emerges overwhelmingly from ‘break-in’ patterns, where AI specialisations persist by aligning with broader national capabilities. This suggests that the dominant integration mechanism is strategic anchoring: a process where a new technology is adapted and hybridised with existing industrial structures. We argue that AI acts as a ‘recombinant bridge’, enabling this hybridisation and creating multiple entry points for national deployment. These findings imply that effective AI policy requires a ‘smart specialisation’-like approach. The goal should be to foster a symbiotic ecosystem that fuses core AI skills with unique industrial strengths through strategic anchoring. This, however, may lead to the rise of ‘hybrid giants’ that dominate multiple sectors, presenting a new frontier of regulatory and geopolitical challenges.

Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Pioneer (United States) (US), University of Bremen (DE), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Economic and Technological Innovation
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.