Two Panel Delphi Study on Adolescent Suicide Protective Factors in Korea

ABSTRACT The present study aimed to seek consensus on protective factors for adolescent suicide within a biopsychosocial model. Three rounds of Delphi surveys were conducted to integrate insights from counselors treating suicidal adolescents and the perspectives of the adolescents. The panelists comprised 63 experts and 37 adolescents. From a pool of congregated potential factors from literature review and expert interviews, consensus was reached for 67 items within the expert panel, 20 items within the adolescent panel. A total of 13 items between the two panels were endorsed despite the additional items introduced by the panels per round. The results prioritized the importance of positivity, existential, coping, family, and peer factors, as both panels consented to them. The endorsed factors, along with discrepancies between the two panels, could enhance suicide prevention in South Korea, as they were validated by a rigorous research process that included a co nsensus a mong the key stakeholders, suicidal adolescents, and their counselors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology in the Schools
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.70115
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Panel Delphi Study on Adolescent Suicide Protective Factors in Korea

Young‐Soon Lee, Sangin Lee, Donghun Lee, Mo Hyun Yang
Psychology in the Schools
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Two Panel Delphi Study on Adolescent Suicide Protective Factors in Korea

Young‐Soon Lee, Sangin Lee, Donghun Lee, Mo Hyun Yang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study aimed to seek consensus on protective factors for adolescent suicide within a biopsychosocial model. Three rounds of Delphi surveys were conducted to integrate insights from counselors treating suicidal adolescents and the perspectives of the adolescents. The panelists comprised 63 experts and 37 adolescents. From a pool of congregated potential factors from literature review and expert interviews, consensus was reached for 67 items within the expert panel, 20 items within the adolescent panel. A total of 13 items between the two panels were endorsed despite the additional items introduced by the panels per round. The results prioritized the importance of positivity, existential, coping, family, and peer factors, as both panels consented to them. The endorsed factors, along with discrepancies between the two panels, could enhance suicide prevention in South Korea, as they were validated by a rigorous research process that included a co nsensus a mong the key stakeholders, suicidal adolescents, and their counselors.

Psychology in the SchoolsVol. 63(3)
Jeonbuk National University (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.