Understanding willingness to fight: Motivational and personality predictors in Ukrainian military personnel with and without combat experience

This study examined psychological predictors of willingness to fight among Ukrainian service members during the ongoing war and whether associations vary by combat experience. A cross-sectional sample of <i>N</i> = 172 personnel (121 combat-experienced; 51 non-combat) completed measures of motivation, Big Five traits, conflict-handling styles, communication skills, and professional hardiness. Descriptive group contrasts emphasized effect sizes (Welch's t with Hedges' g or rank-biserial r where appropriate). Bivariate Pearson correlations (Fisher-z CIs, false-discovery-rate adjustment for the set with willingness) and a theory-driven hierarchical regression with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors were used; moderation was tested with Combat × predictor interactions. Combat-experienced personnel reported higher willingness to fight (g = .48, 95% CI [.15, .81]) and small-to-moderate differences on several traits (e.g. higher Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Competing; lower Avoiding). Zero-order correlations with willingness were strongest for Intrinsic motivation (<i>r</i> = .51), Professional control (<i>r</i> = .40), Professional commitment (<i>r</i> = .39), Openness (<i>r</i> = .37), and Challenge acceptance (<i>r</i> = .34). The final model explained R2 = .49 (adj. R2 = .41); two predictors made unique contributions to willingness to fight: combat experience (β = .43, 95% CI [.10, .77], <i>p</i> = .011) and Intrinsic motivation (β = .35, 95% CI [.17, .52], <i>p</i> < .001). A planned Avoiding × Combat interaction was significant (β = .49, <i>p</i> = .019) with opposite-direction but individually non-significant simple slopes. Findings underscore Intrinsic motivation as the central psychological predictor of willingness to fight, with combat experience providing an additional independent contribution and interpersonal tendencies showing experience-contingent nuances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Military Psychology
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2577060
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding willingness to fight: Motivational and personality predictors in Ukrainian military personnel with and without combat experience

Олег Матвійович Кокун, Аліса Лізун
Military Psychology
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

Understanding willingness to fight: Motivational and personality predictors in Ukrainian military personnel with and without combat experience

Олег Матвійович Кокун, Аліса Лізун
article en

Abstract

This study examined psychological predictors of willingness to fight among Ukrainian service members during the ongoing war and whether associations vary by combat experience. A cross-sectional sample of <i>N</i> = 172 personnel (121 combat-experienced; 51 non-combat) completed measures of motivation, Big Five traits, conflict-handling styles, communication skills, and professional hardiness. Descriptive group contrasts emphasized effect sizes (Welch's t with Hedges' g or rank-biserial r where appropriate). Bivariate Pearson correlations (Fisher-z CIs, false-discovery-rate adjustment for the set with willingness) and a theory-driven hierarchical regression with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors were used; moderation was tested with Combat × predictor interactions. Combat-experienced personnel reported higher willingness to fight (g = .48, 95% CI [.15, .81]) and small-to-moderate differences on several traits (e.g. higher Extraversion, Conscientiousness, Competing; lower Avoiding). Zero-order correlations with willingness were strongest for Intrinsic motivation (<i>r</i> = .51), Professional control (<i>r</i> = .40), Professional commitment (<i>r</i> = .39), Openness (<i>r</i> = .37), and Challenge acceptance (<i>r</i> = .34). The final model explained R2 = .49 (adj. R2 = .41); two predictors made unique contributions to willingness to fight: combat experience (β = .43, 95% CI [.10, .77], <i>p</i> = .011) and Intrinsic motivation (β = .35, 95% CI [.17, .52], <i>p</i> < .001). A planned Avoiding × Combat interaction was significant (β = .49, <i>p</i> = .019) with opposite-direction but individually non-significant simple slopes. Findings underscore Intrinsic motivation as the central psychological predictor of willingness to fight, with combat experience providing an additional independent contribution and interpersonal tendencies showing experience-contingent nuances.

Military Psychology
Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (UA), Modern Art Research Institute (UA), National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.