Language of assessment matters: a study of Ghanaian primary school students’ scientific reasoning skills

Purpose This study aims to examine the extent to which the language of assessment influences primary school students’ scientific reasoning skills and further explores how gender, grade level and school moderate this relationship. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 260 primary school students selected via a multistage sampling technique. Students were assessed using the Science-P(primary) Reasoning Inventory (SPR-I) in either English or the Ghanaian Language (Twi). Descriptive statistics and a multiple regression model were used to analyze the data. The regression model was used to test the main and interaction effects of language, gender, grade level and school type. Findings Language of assessment significantly predicted students’ scientific reasoning skills, with students assessed in Twi demonstrating higher reasoning abilities than those assessed in English. Grade level and school type also had significant effects, while gender and all interaction terms were non-significant. Originality/value This study provides empirical support for the use of mother-tongue assessments in science education. It advances equity-based assessment practices in multilingual contexts like Ghana.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Multicultural Education
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-07-2025-0141
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language of assessment matters: a study of Ghanaian primary school students’ scientific reasoning skills

Edwin Nii Bonney, Oluwafemi Osho, Lauretta O. Osho, Augustine Owusu Achiaw et al.
Journal for Multicultural Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Language of assessment matters: a study of Ghanaian primary school students’ scientific reasoning skills

Edwin Nii Bonney, Oluwafemi Osho, Lauretta O. Osho, Augustine Owusu Achiaw, Kafayat Amoke Adesina, Gertrude Arthur
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the extent to which the language of assessment influences primary school students’ scientific reasoning skills and further explores how gender, grade level and school moderate this relationship. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 260 primary school students selected via a multistage sampling technique. Students were assessed using the Science-P(primary) Reasoning Inventory (SPR-I) in either English or the Ghanaian Language (Twi). Descriptive statistics and a multiple regression model were used to analyze the data. The regression model was used to test the main and interaction effects of language, gender, grade level and school type. Findings Language of assessment significantly predicted students’ scientific reasoning skills, with students assessed in Twi demonstrating higher reasoning abilities than those assessed in English. Grade level and school type also had significant effects, while gender and all interaction terms were non-significant. Originality/value This study provides empirical support for the use of mother-tongue assessments in science education. It advances equity-based assessment practices in multilingual contexts like Ghana.

Journal for Multicultural EducationVol. 20(1)
Eastern New Mexico University (US), Institute of Educational Policy (GR), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.