<scp>Aeos</scp>: The Impact of Population III Initial Mass Function and Star-by-star Models in Galaxy Simulations
Abstract We explore the effect of variations in the Population III initial mass function (IMF) and star-by-star feedback on early galaxy formation and evolution using the A eos simulations. We compare simulations with two different Population III IMFs: M char = 10 M ⊙ and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>max</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:msub> </mml:math> (Aeos10) and M char = 20 M ⊙ and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>max</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>300</mml:mn> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:msub> </mml:math> (Aeos20). Aeos20 produces significantly more ionizing photons, ionizing 30% of the simulation volume by z ≈ 14, compared to 9% in Aeos10. This enhanced ionization suppresses galaxy formation on the smallest scales. Differences in Population III IMF also affect chemical enrichment. Aeos20 produces Population II stars with higher abundances, relative to iron, of light and α -elements, a stronger odd–even effect, and a higher frequency of carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars. The abundance scatter between different Population II galaxies dominates the differences due to Population III IMF, though, implying a need for a larger sample of Population II stars to interpret the impact of Population III IMF on early chemical evolution. We also compare the A eos simulations to traditional simulations that use single stellar population particles. We find that star-by-star modeling produces a steeper mass–metallicity relation due to less bursty feedback. These results highlight the strong influence of the Population III IMF on early galaxy formation and chemical evolution, emphasizing the need to account for IMF uncertainties in simulations and the importance of metal-poor Population II stellar chemical abundances when studying the first stars.
Authors
- Greg L. Bryan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-9228)
- Alexander P. Ji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4863-8842)
- Benoît Côté (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9986-8816)
- Anna Frebel
- Jennifer Mead (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4744-2350)
- John Wise (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1173-8847)
- Kaley Brauer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8810-858X)
- Andrew Emerick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2807-328X)
- Eric P. Andersson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-4606)
- Mordecai‐Mark Mac Low (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0064-4060)
Institutions
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- American Museum of Natural History (US)
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Konkoly Observatory (HU)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- Carnegie Observatories (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Columbia University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Published
- 2025-10-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae06a4
- Primary Topic
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00