Modeling Uncertainty around Free-list Cultural Salience Scores

The free-list method has enjoyed a remarkably productive history, yet most free-list research is limited to informal comparisons that are heavily reliant on point estimates such as item or cultural salience. Here, we demonstrate a range of methods to incorporate uncertainty into such group-level estimates. This approach involves: (1) resampling individual-level data (via bootstrapping or Bayesian regression) to create a range of hypothetical alternative samples; (2) generating group-level estimates (e.g., Smith’s S ) in each sample; and (3) using the variation in these estimates as uncertainty intervals. While we focus predominantly on cultural salience, this approach can be applied to other free-list metrics. We also present some extensions to this approach, such as comparing estimates between items and between groups. We provide open data and code to help readers gain familiarity with these methods. Ultimately, we encourage researchers using free-list data to move beyond simply reporting point estimates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Methods
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x251379224
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Uncertainty around Free-list Cultural Salience Scores

Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Daniel Major‐Smith
Field Methods
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Modeling Uncertainty around Free-list Cultural Salience Scores

Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Daniel Major‐Smith
article en

Abstract

The free-list method has enjoyed a remarkably productive history, yet most free-list research is limited to informal comparisons that are heavily reliant on point estimates such as item or cultural salience. Here, we demonstrate a range of methods to incorporate uncertainty into such group-level estimates. This approach involves: (1) resampling individual-level data (via bootstrapping or Bayesian regression) to create a range of hypothetical alternative samples; (2) generating group-level estimates (e.g., Smith’s S ) in each sample; and (3) using the variation in these estimates as uncertainty intervals. While we focus predominantly on cultural salience, this approach can be applied to other free-list metrics. We also present some extensions to this approach, such as comparing estimates between items and between groups. We provide open data and code to help readers gain familiarity with these methods. Ultimately, we encourage researchers using free-list data to move beyond simply reporting point estimates.

Field MethodsVol. 38(1)
Aarhus University (DK), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.