Design and application of two consistency verification methods for weather radar networks in the South China region

Abstract. The observational consistency between ground-based weather radars significantly impacts the quality of mosaic products and severe convection identification products. The real-time monitoring of observational biases between radars can provide a basis for calibration and validation. This study designed a consistency verification method for weather radar networks based on the FY-3G precipitation radar (SGRCM) and a ground-based weather radar network consistency verification method (AWRCM). From January to October 2024, observational experiments were conducted in the South China region involving 19 S-band weather radars and 13 X-band phased-array weather radars. The aim was to analyze the influencing factors of the consistency verification methods and the observational biases of reflectivity factors for radars with different bands and systems. For the S-band weather radars, the difference in the bias between the two methods ranged from −1.5 to 1.4 dB, and the difference in the standard deviation ranged from −1.2 to 1.2 dB. For the X-band phased-array weather radars, the difference in the bias between the two methods ranged from −6.67 to 0.84 dB, and the difference in the standard deviation ranged from −0.38 to 1.51 dB. The evaluation results of the two methods show good consistency for weather radars with different bands. We selected one radar with a larger bias for recalibration and rectification, and the changes in bias before and after rectification thus provide a good indication of the improvement in network consistency among the radars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5507-2025
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design and application of two consistency verification methods for weather radar networks in the South China region

Yong Liu, Hao Wen, Suyang Pei, Lei Wu et al.
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
article

Design and application of two consistency verification methods for weather radar networks in the South China region

Yong Liu, Hao Wen, Suyang Pei, Lei Wu, Chunyan Zhang, Heng Hu, Nan Shao
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The observational consistency between ground-based weather radars significantly impacts the quality of mosaic products and severe convection identification products. The real-time monitoring of observational biases between radars can provide a basis for calibration and validation. This study designed a consistency verification method for weather radar networks based on the FY-3G precipitation radar (SGRCM) and a ground-based weather radar network consistency verification method (AWRCM). From January to October 2024, observational experiments were conducted in the South China region involving 19 S-band weather radars and 13 X-band phased-array weather radars. The aim was to analyze the influencing factors of the consistency verification methods and the observational biases of reflectivity factors for radars with different bands and systems. For the S-band weather radars, the difference in the bias between the two methods ranged from −1.5 to 1.4 dB, and the difference in the standard deviation ranged from −1.2 to 1.2 dB. For the X-band phased-array weather radars, the difference in the bias between the two methods ranged from −6.67 to 0.84 dB, and the difference in the standard deviation ranged from −0.38 to 1.51 dB. The evaluation results of the two methods show good consistency for weather radars with different bands. We selected one radar with a larger bias for recalibration and rectification, and the changes in bias before and after rectification thus provide a good indication of the improvement in network consistency among the radars.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 18(20)
China Meteorological Administration (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Center of Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Harvard University
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.