Reliable outcome parameters in patients with lumbar radiculopathy attributed to disc herniation: an observational study

Introduction Evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of physical assessments and patient-reported outcome measures in lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy remains inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate whether selected patient-reported outcome measures and physical assessments accurately reflect treatment progress, regardless of whether the treatment was conservative only or combined with surgery. Methods Mobility, isometric strength, pain, numbness, paresthesia, Oswestry Disability Index, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, straight-leg raising test, and the Short Form-36 Health Survey physical and mental components were recorded at baseline, after six weeks, and at six months. Results At six weeks ( n = 19), significant improvements were observed in the straight-leg raising test (mean difference: 10.53, 95% CI: 1.25–19.81, p = 0.02), the Short Form-36 Health Survey physical component score (9.06, 95% CI: 4.23–13.90, p < 0.001), and the mental component score (10.29, 95% CI: 4.81–15.76, p < 0.001), pain sensation (−2.46, 95% CI: −3.99–−0.93, p < 0.001), paresthesia (−2.36, 95% CI: −3.73–−0.99, p < 0.001), numbness (−1.35, 95% CI: −2.56–−0.14, p = 0.023), and in the Oswestry Disability Index score (−20.42, 95% CI: −28.04–−12.80, p < 0.001). At six months ( n = 15), significant benefits were noted in anterior flexion (−8.19, 95% CI: −13.42–−2.96, p = 0.001), back extension (9.35, 95% CI: 4.52–14.18, p < 0.001), and muscle strength in the affected leg (tibialis anterior muscle: 44.27, 95% CI: 4.72–83.81, p = 0.024; extensor hallucis longus muscle: 16.58, 95% CI: 2.60–30.56, p = 0.02). No significant changes occurred in lateral flexion left or right, strength in the unaffected leg, or the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Conclusion The exploratory findings of this study indicate that subjective outcomes improve earlier than objective measures. These findings emphasize the value of combining subjective and objective methods to monitor treatment outcomes and assess progress effectively. Larger studies with more participants, frequent evaluations, and longer follow-up are needed to clarify recovery patterns, determine the most sensitive outcome measures, and define minimal clinically important differences for patients with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmscd.2025.1672539
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliable outcome parameters in patients with lumbar radiculopathy attributed to disc herniation: an observational study

Christian Zweifel, Erich Hohenauer, Ron Clijsen, Joseph Alvin Santos et al.
Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Reliable outcome parameters in patients with lumbar radiculopathy attributed to disc herniation: an observational study

Christian Zweifel, Erich Hohenauer, Ron Clijsen, Joseph Alvin Santos, Giannina Bianchi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of physical assessments and patient-reported outcome measures in lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy remains inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate whether selected patient-reported outcome measures and physical assessments accurately reflect treatment progress, regardless of whether the treatment was conservative only or combined with surgery. Methods Mobility, isometric strength, pain, numbness, paresthesia, Oswestry Disability Index, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, straight-leg raising test, and the Short Form-36 Health Survey physical and mental components were recorded at baseline, after six weeks, and at six months. Results At six weeks ( n = 19), significant improvements were observed in the straight-leg raising test (mean difference: 10.53, 95% CI: 1.25–19.81, p = 0.02), the Short Form-36 Health Survey physical component score (9.06, 95% CI: 4.23–13.90, p < 0.001), and the mental component score (10.29, 95% CI: 4.81–15.76, p < 0.001), pain sensation (−2.46, 95% CI: −3.99–−0.93, p < 0.001), paresthesia (−2.36, 95% CI: −3.73–−0.99, p < 0.001), numbness (−1.35, 95% CI: −2.56–−0.14, p = 0.023), and in the Oswestry Disability Index score (−20.42, 95% CI: −28.04–−12.80, p < 0.001). At six months ( n = 15), significant benefits were noted in anterior flexion (−8.19, 95% CI: −13.42–−2.96, p = 0.001), back extension (9.35, 95% CI: 4.52–14.18, p < 0.001), and muscle strength in the affected leg (tibialis anterior muscle: 44.27, 95% CI: 4.72–83.81, p = 0.024; extensor hallucis longus muscle: 16.58, 95% CI: 2.60–30.56, p = 0.02). No significant changes occurred in lateral flexion left or right, strength in the unaffected leg, or the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Conclusion The exploratory findings of this study indicate that subjective outcomes improve earlier than objective measures. These findings emphasize the value of combining subjective and objective methods to monitor treatment outcomes and assess progress effectively. Larger studies with more participants, frequent evaluations, and longer follow-up are needed to clarify recovery patterns, determine the most sensitive outcome measures, and define minimal clinically important differences for patients with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy.

Frontiers in Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 3
Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH), University of Fribourg (CH), THIM van der Laan University College Physiotherapy (CH), Kantonsspital Graubünden (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.