Sustainable composites for metal replacement: Environmental assessment and material selection of fiber-reinforced polymer across industries

• LCA reveals life cycle trade-offs in FRP use across key industrial applications. • Fiber and resin synthesis drive upstream GHG emissions and energy intensity. • Functional units and boundary choices limit consistency in FRP LCA results. • Recycling challenges persist; circular economy remains underexplored in FRP LCAs. • Decarbonizing FRPs needs LCA harmonization, circular strategies, and policies. The urgent necessity to mitigate climate change and reduce resource depletion is accelerating the shift toward sustainable materials in critical industries. Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) has been gaining attention as an alternative to steel and aluminum in construction, automotive, and pipeline applications due to its exceptional high-performance properties. However, the environmental implications of FRP remain a concern, predominantly due to energy-intensive production processes and end-of-life (EoL) challenges. This review offers a comprehensive, cross-sectoral analysis of life-cycle assessment (LCA) findings on FRP, highlighting sector-specific drivers, environmental trade-offs, and methodological limitations. Although use-phase benefits, such as reduced emissions and lower maintenance costs, are well documented, they are often offset by the high embodied energy and underdeveloped recycling infrastructure. Existing LCA studies have emphasized climate impacts, while underrepresenting various indicators, including human toxicity, resource depletion, and circularity. Methodological limitations, such as generic datasets, a lack of performance-based functional units, and simplified EoL modeling, compromise comparability. Mechanical recycling often yields low-quality output with reduced performance, limiting reuse in high-value applications, whereas thermal and chemical methods face challenges in energy and scalability. Future efforts must prioritize standardized LCA methods, region-specific background datasets, circular economy integration, and advanced recycling technology to realize the full sustainability potential of FRP. A strategic framework is necessary to enable the widespread use of FRP as a viable, low-carbon alternative in a net-zero future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200294
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable composites for metal replacement: Environmental assessment and material selection of fiber-reinforced polymer across industries

Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi, Anissa Nurdiawati, Eman Alrehaili
2 citations
Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances
Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
1.43
article

Sustainable composites for metal replacement: Environmental assessment and material selection of fiber-reinforced polymer across industries

Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi, Anissa Nurdiawati, Eman Alrehaili
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• LCA reveals life cycle trade-offs in FRP use across key industrial applications. • Fiber and resin synthesis drive upstream GHG emissions and energy intensity. • Functional units and boundary choices limit consistency in FRP LCA results. • Recycling challenges persist; circular economy remains underexplored in FRP LCAs. • Decarbonizing FRPs needs LCA harmonization, circular strategies, and policies. The urgent necessity to mitigate climate change and reduce resource depletion is accelerating the shift toward sustainable materials in critical industries. Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) has been gaining attention as an alternative to steel and aluminum in construction, automotive, and pipeline applications due to its exceptional high-performance properties. However, the environmental implications of FRP remain a concern, predominantly due to energy-intensive production processes and end-of-life (EoL) challenges. This review offers a comprehensive, cross-sectoral analysis of life-cycle assessment (LCA) findings on FRP, highlighting sector-specific drivers, environmental trade-offs, and methodological limitations. Although use-phase benefits, such as reduced emissions and lower maintenance costs, are well documented, they are often offset by the high embodied energy and underdeveloped recycling infrastructure. Existing LCA studies have emphasized climate impacts, while underrepresenting various indicators, including human toxicity, resource depletion, and circularity. Methodological limitations, such as generic datasets, a lack of performance-based functional units, and simplified EoL modeling, compromise comparability. Mechanical recycling often yields low-quality output with reduced performance, limiting reuse in high-value applications, whereas thermal and chemical methods face challenges in energy and scalability. Future efforts must prioritize standardized LCA methods, region-specific background datasets, circular economy integration, and advanced recycling technology to realize the full sustainability potential of FRP. A strategic framework is necessary to enable the widespread use of FRP as a viable, low-carbon alternative in a net-zero future.

Resources Conservation & Recycling AdvancesVol. 28
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.