Contradiction as Method - A Critical-Theoretical Approach to Ideational Economic Geography

This paper seeks to advance the emerging field of ideational economic geography by employing Frankfurt School critical theory, particularly Adorno's negative dialectics, to move beyond the dichotomy between critical realist and constructivist approaches. Current debates position imaginaries either as 'real' causal forces (critical realism) or as socially constructed meanings (constructivism), creating an apparent choice that limits analytical possibilities for understanding how sustainability imaginaries both express genuine ecological needs and contain them within existing social relations. The framework developed in this paper reconceptualizes ideational elements as inherently contradictory mediations between materiality and the process of ideation, transcending this divide through dialectical analysis that reveals how contradictions are constitutive rather than merely disruptive. This paper further suggests methodological strategies that focus on ruptures and failures as privileged moments for revealing these contradictions and their transformative potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Economic Geography
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peg.2025.100050
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contradiction as Method - A Critical-Theoretical Approach to Ideational Economic Geography

Nicklas Riekötter
Progress in Economic Geography
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

Contradiction as Method - A Critical-Theoretical Approach to Ideational Economic Geography

Nicklas Riekötter
article en

Abstract

This paper seeks to advance the emerging field of ideational economic geography by employing Frankfurt School critical theory, particularly Adorno's negative dialectics, to move beyond the dichotomy between critical realist and constructivist approaches. Current debates position imaginaries either as 'real' causal forces (critical realism) or as socially constructed meanings (constructivism), creating an apparent choice that limits analytical possibilities for understanding how sustainability imaginaries both express genuine ecological needs and contain them within existing social relations. The framework developed in this paper reconceptualizes ideational elements as inherently contradictory mediations between materiality and the process of ideation, transcending this divide through dialectical analysis that reveals how contradictions are constitutive rather than merely disruptive. This paper further suggests methodological strategies that focus on ruptures and failures as privileged moments for revealing these contradictions and their transformative potential.

Progress in Economic GeographyVol. 3(2)
University of Luxembourg (LU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contradiction as Method - A Critical-Theoretical Approach to Ideational Economic Geography — Nicklas Riekötter · Progress in Economic Geography (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS