Comparison of Machine Learning Models in Nonlinear and Stochastic Signal Classification

This study aims to compare different classifiers in the context of distinguishing two classes of signals: nonlinear electrocardiography (ECG) signals and stochastic artifacts occurring in ECG signals. The ECG signals from a single-lead wearable Movesense device were analyzed with a set of eight features: variance (VAR), three fractal dimension measures (Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD), Katz fractal dimension (KFD), and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA)), and four entropy measures (approximate entropy (ApEn), sample entropy (SampEn), and multiscale entropy (MSE) for scales 1 and 2). The minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance algorithm was applied for evaluation of feature importance. A broad spectrum of machine learning models was considered for classification. The proposed approach allowed for comparison of classifier features, as well as providing a broader insight into the characteristics of the signals themselves. The most important features for classification were VAR, DFA, ApEn, and HFD. The best performance among 34 classifiers was obtained using an optimized RUSBoosted Trees ensemble classifier (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 99.8, 73.7%, 99.8, and 74.3, respectively). The accuracy of the Movesense device was very high (99.6%). Moreover, the multifractality of ECG during sleep was observed in the relationship between SampEn (or ApEn) and MSE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011226
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Machine Learning Models in Nonlinear and Stochastic Signal Classification

Carlo Massaroni, Elżbieta Olejarczyk
Applied Sciences
Fault Detection and Control Systems
article

Comparison of Machine Learning Models in Nonlinear and Stochastic Signal Classification

Carlo Massaroni, Elżbieta Olejarczyk
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare different classifiers in the context of distinguishing two classes of signals: nonlinear electrocardiography (ECG) signals and stochastic artifacts occurring in ECG signals. The ECG signals from a single-lead wearable Movesense device were analyzed with a set of eight features: variance (VAR), three fractal dimension measures (Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD), Katz fractal dimension (KFD), and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA)), and four entropy measures (approximate entropy (ApEn), sample entropy (SampEn), and multiscale entropy (MSE) for scales 1 and 2). The minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance algorithm was applied for evaluation of feature importance. A broad spectrum of machine learning models was considered for classification. The proposed approach allowed for comparison of classifier features, as well as providing a broader insight into the characteristics of the signals themselves. The most important features for classification were VAR, DFA, ApEn, and HFD. The best performance among 34 classifiers was obtained using an optimized RUSBoosted Trees ensemble classifier (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 99.8, 73.7%, 99.8, and 74.3, respectively). The accuracy of the Movesense device was very high (99.6%). Moreover, the multifractality of ECG during sleep was observed in the relationship between SampEn (or ApEn) and MSE.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(20)
Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.