Developing Indicators for the Valuation of River Ecosystem Services

River ecosystems provide essential services that sustain human well-being and ecological integrity, yet their contributions are often underestimated in management and policy decisions. This study aims to develop and validate indicators for quantifying river ecosystem services to support evidence-based decision-making. A review of previous studies was conducted to compile a preliminary list of indicators. Expert evaluations were then applied using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and content validity ratio (CVR) analysis to assess their representativeness and reliability. The results identified priority indicators across provisioning, regulating, and cultural services. The findings revealed that, in the AHP analysis, regulating services received the highest weight (0.4567), followed by provisioning services (0.3811) and cultural services (0.1622). In the CVR analysis, four valid indicators were identified for provisioning services, sixteen for regulating services, and eight for cultural services. These findings highlight the importance of careful indicator selection and methodological transparency. The study contributes a refined set of indicators that can inform river restoration initiatives, sustainable water management, and integration into national ecosystem accounting systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14102091
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing Indicators for the Valuation of River Ecosystem Services

Jong Yune Kim, Hyun No Kim
1 citations
Land
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Developing Indicators for the Valuation of River Ecosystem Services

Jong Yune Kim, Hyun No Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

River ecosystems provide essential services that sustain human well-being and ecological integrity, yet their contributions are often underestimated in management and policy decisions. This study aims to develop and validate indicators for quantifying river ecosystem services to support evidence-based decision-making. A review of previous studies was conducted to compile a preliminary list of indicators. Expert evaluations were then applied using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and content validity ratio (CVR) analysis to assess their representativeness and reliability. The results identified priority indicators across provisioning, regulating, and cultural services. The findings revealed that, in the AHP analysis, regulating services received the highest weight (0.4567), followed by provisioning services (0.3811) and cultural services (0.1622). In the CVR analysis, four valid indicators were identified for provisioning services, sixteen for regulating services, and eight for cultural services. These findings highlight the importance of careful indicator selection and methodological transparency. The study contributes a refined set of indicators that can inform river restoration initiatives, sustainable water management, and integration into national ecosystem accounting systems.

LandVol. 14(10)
Korea Environment Institute (KR)
Korea Environment Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.