Evaluation of Safety and Acceptability of 40 Hz Amplitude-Modulated Auditory Stimulation in Healthy Older People: A Prospective Study from Japan

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Dysregulated gamma oscillations are associated with cognitive dysfunction. Auditory stimulation at 40 Hz enhances neural activity in brain regions associated with learning, attention, and memory. This study assessed the safety and acceptability of 40 Hz amplitude-modulated auditory stimulation in healthy older people. Auditory stimuli were created using popular songs, where vocals and background music were separated and independently amplitude-modulated at 40 Hz with different modulation depths to generate periodic 40 Hz gamma waveforms. <b>Methods</b>: In this open-label, single-arm study, healthy participants aged ≥65 years received 40 Hz amplitude-modulated auditory stimulation daily via a smartphone for 28 days through earphones/headphones. Safety was assessed through adverse event (AE) monitoring and changes in clinical scores for depression, cognitive function, and hearing thresholds. Acceptability was evaluated by adherence rates, listening time, dropout reasons, volume levels, intent for future use, and subjective impressions of the sound source on a 7-point Likert scale. <b>Results</b>: Among 28 participants (mean age 69.1 years, 53.6% female), six reported 12 AEs, with six considered device-related (e.g., ear discomfort, jaw pain, musculoskeletal stiffness). The AEs observed were mild or moderate. Scores for cognitive function, depression, and hearing thresholds did not worsen during the study period. Adherence was observed in 96.4%, with 85.7% expressing interest in continuing. Most participants rated the sounds' unnaturalness between 2 and 3 and discomfort between 1 and 3 on the 7-point Likert scale. <b>Conclusions</b>: The intervention was well tolerated and acceptable in study participants, with no major safety concerns identified. Auditory stimulation did not cause severe discomfort or reduce acceptability. Further studies should explore the long-term effects and broader clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13202638
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Safety and Acceptability of 40 Hz Amplitude-Modulated Auditory Stimulation in Healthy Older People: A Prospective Study from Japan

Kazuma Maeda, Keita Tanaka, Eriko Ogura, Manabu Ikeda et al.
3 citations
Healthcare
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
4.29
article

Evaluation of Safety and Acceptability of 40 Hz Amplitude-Modulated Auditory Stimulation in Healthy Older People: A Prospective Study from Japan

Kazuma Maeda, Keita Tanaka, Eriko Ogura, Manabu Ikeda, Yumi Ohta, Yoshiki Nagatani, Kazuki Takazawa, Kentaro Morimoto, Shinzo Hiroi, Shunsuke Sato, T. Kasai, Hiroki Fukuju, Hiroki Chinen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Dysregulated gamma oscillations are associated with cognitive dysfunction. Auditory stimulation at 40 Hz enhances neural activity in brain regions associated with learning, attention, and memory. This study assessed the safety and acceptability of 40 Hz amplitude-modulated auditory stimulation in healthy older people. Auditory stimuli were created using popular songs, where vocals and background music were separated and independently amplitude-modulated at 40 Hz with different modulation depths to generate periodic 40 Hz gamma waveforms. <b>Methods</b>: In this open-label, single-arm study, healthy participants aged ≥65 years received 40 Hz amplitude-modulated auditory stimulation daily via a smartphone for 28 days through earphones/headphones. Safety was assessed through adverse event (AE) monitoring and changes in clinical scores for depression, cognitive function, and hearing thresholds. Acceptability was evaluated by adherence rates, listening time, dropout reasons, volume levels, intent for future use, and subjective impressions of the sound source on a 7-point Likert scale. <b>Results</b>: Among 28 participants (mean age 69.1 years, 53.6% female), six reported 12 AEs, with six considered device-related (e.g., ear discomfort, jaw pain, musculoskeletal stiffness). The AEs observed were mild or moderate. Scores for cognitive function, depression, and hearing thresholds did not worsen during the study period. Adherence was observed in 96.4%, with 85.7% expressing interest in continuing. Most participants rated the sounds' unnaturalness between 2 and 3 and discomfort between 1 and 3 on the 7-point Likert scale. <b>Conclusions</b>: The intervention was well tolerated and acceptable in study participants, with no major safety concerns identified. Auditory stimulation did not cause severe discomfort or reduce acceptability. Further studies should explore the long-term effects and broader clinical applications.

HealthcareVol. 13(20)
Joyson Safety Systems (Japan) (JP), Osaka Health Science University (JP), Shionogi (Japan) (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.