Comparative Clinical and Volumetric Outcomes of Contemporary Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is a prevalent degenerative condition associated with significant radicular pain and impaired quality of life. Advances in minimally invasive and fusion-based surgical techniques have introduced new strategies for decompressing the neural elements. However, comparative data correlating volumetric foraminal expansion with functional outcomes remain limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 256 patients treated surgically for symptomatic LFS between December 2017 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into four surgical subgroups: endoscopic decompression, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), microsurgical decompression, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Preoperative and postoperative assessments included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to calculate foraminal volume and standardized clinical scales: the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and SF-36 health-related quality-of-life scores. Statistical significance was determined using p-values, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated via κ-statistics. Results: Postoperative imaging demonstrated a significant increase in foraminal canal volume across all surgical groups: endoscopy (29.9%), ALIF (71.8%), microsurgery (48.06%), and TLIF (67.0%). ODI scores improved from a preoperative mean of 55.25 to 18.27 at 24 months post-surgery (p < 0.001). VAS scores for back pain decreased from 6.37 to 2.1 (p < 0.001), while leg pain scores declined from 6.85 to 2.05 (p < 0.001). Functional improvement reached or exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold in over 66% of patients. Conclusions: Modern surgical strategies for LFS, particularly fusion-based techniques, yield significant volumetric decompression and durable clinical improvement. Volumetric gain in the foraminal canal is closely associated with pain reduction and enhanced functional outcomes. These findings support a tailored surgical approach based on anatomical pathology and segmental stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgeries
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries6040091
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Clinical and Volumetric Outcomes of Contemporary Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abakirov Medetbek, А. А. Гусева, Nicola Montemurro, V. A. Klimov et al.
1 citations
Surgeries
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
article

Comparative Clinical and Volumetric Outcomes of Contemporary Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abakirov Medetbek, А. А. Гусева, Nicola Montemurro, V. A. Klimov, Medet Dosanov, Stepan Kudryakov, Renat Nurmukhametov, Petr Ruslanovich Baigushev, Timur Arturovich Kerimov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is a prevalent degenerative condition associated with significant radicular pain and impaired quality of life. Advances in minimally invasive and fusion-based surgical techniques have introduced new strategies for decompressing the neural elements. However, comparative data correlating volumetric foraminal expansion with functional outcomes remain limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 256 patients treated surgically for symptomatic LFS between December 2017 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into four surgical subgroups: endoscopic decompression, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), microsurgical decompression, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Preoperative and postoperative assessments included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to calculate foraminal volume and standardized clinical scales: the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and SF-36 health-related quality-of-life scores. Statistical significance was determined using p-values, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated via κ-statistics. Results: Postoperative imaging demonstrated a significant increase in foraminal canal volume across all surgical groups: endoscopy (29.9%), ALIF (71.8%), microsurgery (48.06%), and TLIF (67.0%). ODI scores improved from a preoperative mean of 55.25 to 18.27 at 24 months post-surgery (p < 0.001). VAS scores for back pain decreased from 6.37 to 2.1 (p < 0.001), while leg pain scores declined from 6.85 to 2.05 (p < 0.001). Functional improvement reached or exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold in over 66% of patients. Conclusions: Modern surgical strategies for LFS, particularly fusion-based techniques, yield significant volumetric decompression and durable clinical improvement. Volumetric gain in the foraminal canal is closely associated with pain reduction and enhanced functional outcomes. These findings support a tailored surgical approach based on anatomical pathology and segmental stability.

SurgeriesVol. 6(4)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), Russian Scientific Center of Surgery (RU), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.