What is underneath? – UV analysis of wing undersides reveals high intraspecific variability in cryptic Agrodiaetus species (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Polyommatus)

While most butterfly species in the genus <i>Polyommatus</i> Latreille, 1804 (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) exhibit strong sexual dimorphism, several species in the subgenus Agrodiaetus Hübner, 1822 are monomorphic, with males and females having a similar brown coloration. It is also known that this monomorphic complex of <i>Agrodiaetus</i> butterflies consists of morphologically very similar cryptic species that are almost identical in coloration and wing pattern, at least to the human eye, which, unlike that of butterflies, does not perceive ultraviolet (UV) light. However, these species can be reliably distinguished by karyotype and molecular markers. In this article it is demonstrated that cryptic species of the monomorphic complex are quite variable in wing pattern coloration in the UV spectrum. Unexpectedly, a very high level of intraspecific morphological variability was found, which concerns the degree of UV reflection and absorption by the wings or their parts, as well as the presence or absence of various elements of the wing pattern. This variability far exceeds those few variations of a single plan that is seen in the visible spectrum. At the same time, it is important to note that all these differences are intraspecific rather than interspecific; that is, the butterflies are morphologically polymorphic, but the species themselves do not differ. In this work 13 types of UV pattern are described, their distributions analysed across species and populations as well as differences in UV pattern between allopatric and sympatric populations. Variability in UV coloration in butterflies within the <i>Agrodiaetus</i> monomorphic complex and its probable relation to caterpillar food preferences are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ZooKeys
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1256.165602
Primary Topic
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is underneath? – UV analysis of wing undersides reveals high intraspecific variability in cryptic Agrodiaetus species (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Polyommatus)

Alexander V. Dantchenko, Maria Vishnevskaya, Elizaveta Gorodilova, Vladimir A. Lukhtanov
ZooKeys
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
article

What is underneath? – UV analysis of wing undersides reveals high intraspecific variability in cryptic Agrodiaetus species (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Polyommatus)

Alexander V. Dantchenko, Maria Vishnevskaya, Elizaveta Gorodilova, Vladimir A. Lukhtanov
article en

Abstract

While most butterfly species in the genus <i>Polyommatus</i> Latreille, 1804 (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) exhibit strong sexual dimorphism, several species in the subgenus Agrodiaetus Hübner, 1822 are monomorphic, with males and females having a similar brown coloration. It is also known that this monomorphic complex of <i>Agrodiaetus</i> butterflies consists of morphologically very similar cryptic species that are almost identical in coloration and wing pattern, at least to the human eye, which, unlike that of butterflies, does not perceive ultraviolet (UV) light. However, these species can be reliably distinguished by karyotype and molecular markers. In this article it is demonstrated that cryptic species of the monomorphic complex are quite variable in wing pattern coloration in the UV spectrum. Unexpectedly, a very high level of intraspecific morphological variability was found, which concerns the degree of UV reflection and absorption by the wings or their parts, as well as the presence or absence of various elements of the wing pattern. This variability far exceeds those few variations of a single plan that is seen in the visible spectrum. At the same time, it is important to note that all these differences are intraspecific rather than interspecific; that is, the butterflies are morphologically polymorphic, but the species themselves do not differ. In this work 13 types of UV pattern are described, their distributions analysed across species and populations as well as differences in UV pattern between allopatric and sympatric populations. Variability in UV coloration in butterflies within the <i>Agrodiaetus</i> monomorphic complex and its probable relation to caterpillar food preferences are discussed.

ZooKeysVol. 1256
St Petersburg University (RU), Zoological Institute (RU)
Saint Petersburg State University, Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.