Automated detection of potential artifacts in machine learning based bio-image segmentation

Abstract Image segmentation algorithms, while powerful, are inherently prone to artifacts, making perfect segmentation theoretically and practically impossible. We propose an automated artifact identification scheme for posterior rapid manual re-correction to address this challenge. Hereby, our contribution is twofold: We extend our previous work, delivering polynomial defenses (PDs). These defenses mimic noise distributions that significantly improve segmentation quality when removed from the training images. In practice, we perturb unseen images with PDs and demonstrate that the resulting segmentation differences achieve promising precision in artifact detection compared to traditional Gaussian and Poisson noise perturbations. This automated guidance is our essential contribution. Beyond improving the reliability of image-processing outputs, our approach provides a valuable tool for enhancing manually segmented training datasets. Hereby, the automated guidance massively decreases manual cross-checking time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ae1546
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated detection of potential artifacts in machine learning based bio-image segmentation

Zongru Shao, Michael Hecht, Saiyam Jain
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Automated detection of potential artifacts in machine learning based bio-image segmentation

Zongru Shao, Michael Hecht, Saiyam Jain
article en

Abstract

Abstract Image segmentation algorithms, while powerful, are inherently prone to artifacts, making perfect segmentation theoretically and practically impossible. We propose an automated artifact identification scheme for posterior rapid manual re-correction to address this challenge. Hereby, our contribution is twofold: We extend our previous work, delivering polynomial defenses (PDs). These defenses mimic noise distributions that significantly improve segmentation quality when removed from the training images. In practice, we perturb unseen images with PDs and demonstrate that the resulting segmentation differences achieve promising precision in artifact detection compared to traditional Gaussian and Poisson noise perturbations. This automated guidance is our essential contribution. Beyond improving the reliability of image-processing outputs, our approach provides a valuable tool for enhancing manually segmented training datasets. Hereby, the automated guidance massively decreases manual cross-checking time.

Machine Learning Science and TechnologyVol. 6(4)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Silicon Austria Labs (Austria) (AT), Center for Advanced Systems Understanding (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.