Evaluation of Adding Customized Plication in Lipoabdominoplasty: A preliminary Pilot Study in Zagazig University Hospitals

Background: Musculoaponeurotic laxity is a key contributor to abdominal wall deformities, particularly in postpartum women. While vertical (midline) plication remains the standard approach in abdominoplasty, it often falls short in achieving optimal waist definition and contour. This study evaluates the aesthetic and clinical outcomes of adding customized musculoaponeurotic plications such as transverse, oblique, or multidirectional to vertical plication in lipoabdominoplasty. So, we aimed to achieve better aesthetic body contouring Methods: This is a preliminary Pilot Study conducted at Zagazig University Hospitals and included 12 healthy multiparous female patients undergoing lipoabdominoplasty. Patients were divided based on plication technique: vertical-only (n=6), vertical + lateral (n=2), vertical + oblique (n=3), and crossbow (multidirectional) (n=1). Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated pre- and post-operatively using photographic documentation and waistline by tape measure and a five-point Likert scale assessing abdominal contour, waistline definition, and overall satisfaction. Complications, drain output, and recovery profiles were also analyzed. Results: The addition of oblique and multidirectional plications resulted in greater waist circumference reduction (p = 0.045) and higher patient satisfaction, despite not reaching statistical significance in satisfaction scores (early p = 0.786; late p = 0.643). No significant differences in complication rates or drain duration were observed among groups. Vertical-only plication showed a higher incidence of minor complications, such as dog ears and scar hypertrophy. All patients remained hemodynamically and metabolically stable throughout the perioperative period. Conclusion: Customized musculoaponeurotic plication techniques especially oblique and multidirectional approaches may offer superior aesthetic outcomes in lipoabdominoplasty without increasing complication rates or recovery time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Published
2025-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2025.419106.4144
Primary Topic
Body Contouring and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Adding Customized Plication in Lipoabdominoplasty: A preliminary Pilot Study in Zagazig University Hospitals

Yehia Zakaria Awaad, Mohamed Ali Nasr, Eslam Esmail Abbas, Salma Mohamed Nasr
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Body Contouring and Surgery
article

Evaluation of Adding Customized Plication in Lipoabdominoplasty: A preliminary Pilot Study in Zagazig University Hospitals

Yehia Zakaria Awaad, Mohamed Ali Nasr, Eslam Esmail Abbas, Salma Mohamed Nasr
article en

Abstract

Background: Musculoaponeurotic laxity is a key contributor to abdominal wall deformities, particularly in postpartum women. While vertical (midline) plication remains the standard approach in abdominoplasty, it often falls short in achieving optimal waist definition and contour. This study evaluates the aesthetic and clinical outcomes of adding customized musculoaponeurotic plications such as transverse, oblique, or multidirectional to vertical plication in lipoabdominoplasty. So, we aimed to achieve better aesthetic body contouring Methods: This is a preliminary Pilot Study conducted at Zagazig University Hospitals and included 12 healthy multiparous female patients undergoing lipoabdominoplasty. Patients were divided based on plication technique: vertical-only (n=6), vertical + lateral (n=2), vertical + oblique (n=3), and crossbow (multidirectional) (n=1). Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated pre- and post-operatively using photographic documentation and waistline by tape measure and a five-point Likert scale assessing abdominal contour, waistline definition, and overall satisfaction. Complications, drain output, and recovery profiles were also analyzed. Results: The addition of oblique and multidirectional plications resulted in greater waist circumference reduction (p = 0.045) and higher patient satisfaction, despite not reaching statistical significance in satisfaction scores (early p = 0.786; late p = 0.643). No significant differences in complication rates or drain duration were observed among groups. Vertical-only plication showed a higher incidence of minor complications, such as dog ears and scar hypertrophy. All patients remained hemodynamically and metabolically stable throughout the perioperative period. Conclusion: Customized musculoaponeurotic plication techniques especially oblique and multidirectional approaches may offer superior aesthetic outcomes in lipoabdominoplasty without increasing complication rates or recovery time.

Zagazig University Medical JournalVol. 0(0)
Zagazig University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Body Contouring and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.