Strength Prediction of Underground Hard Rock Pillars: Effects of Geometric Ratio, complex and straightforward Discontinuities with different Dip Angles

Stability of hard rock pillars underground is significantly influenced by discontinuities and geometrical factors, but not much is understood about their coupled effects and interaction mechanisms. Stability design approaches do not have adequate tools for strength prediction, especially in presence of several discontinuities.Laboratory tests were carried out on cement-sand blocks having different width-to-height (W/H) ratios (0.5, 1.0, 2.0) with single and double discontinuities at various dip angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°). Test procedure included Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) testing, ultrasonic wave velocity testing, numerical model verification, and statistical analysis for developing equations.Results indicate that wide pillars (W/H=2.0) demonstrated superior stability, retaining 55-82% of intact strength (26.67-48.22 MPa range), while slender pillars (W/H=0.5) showed higher sensitivity with 46-88% strength retention (13.78-26.67 MPa range). The 45° discontinuity orientation was consistently most critical, producing strength reductions of 29%, 44%, and 44% for wide, cubic, and slender pillars respectively. Double discontinuity configurations, particularly 30°-45° combinations, induced severe strength losses up to 54% in slender pillars (minimum strength:13.78 MPa), significantly exceeding single discontinuity effects. P-wave velocity reductions strongly correlated with strength degradation, reaching 14.4% and 15.1% for critical double discontinuity combinations in wide and slender pillars respectively. Two empirical equations were derived for strength prediction and showed excellent agreement with experimental data (R²= 0.949 and 0.924, respectively). The study offers validated pillar strength prediction tools using destructive and non-destructive approaches. The formulated equations and established relationships between discontinuity effects and geometry improve pillar design methodology, providing practical guidelines for underground mine operations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciences
Published
2025-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2025.409522.1649
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength Prediction of Underground Hard Rock Pillars: Effects of Geometric Ratio, complex and straightforward Discontinuities with different Dip Angles

Sherif M. Elsayed, M. Allam, Mohamed Abdeltawab Elgindy, Ahmed Atteya Sedeek
JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Strength Prediction of Underground Hard Rock Pillars: Effects of Geometric Ratio, complex and straightforward Discontinuities with different Dip Angles

Sherif M. Elsayed, M. Allam, Mohamed Abdeltawab Elgindy, Ahmed Atteya Sedeek
article en

Abstract

Stability of hard rock pillars underground is significantly influenced by discontinuities and geometrical factors, but not much is understood about their coupled effects and interaction mechanisms. Stability design approaches do not have adequate tools for strength prediction, especially in presence of several discontinuities.Laboratory tests were carried out on cement-sand blocks having different width-to-height (W/H) ratios (0.5, 1.0, 2.0) with single and double discontinuities at various dip angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°). Test procedure included Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) testing, ultrasonic wave velocity testing, numerical model verification, and statistical analysis for developing equations.Results indicate that wide pillars (W/H=2.0) demonstrated superior stability, retaining 55-82% of intact strength (26.67-48.22 MPa range), while slender pillars (W/H=0.5) showed higher sensitivity with 46-88% strength retention (13.78-26.67 MPa range). The 45° discontinuity orientation was consistently most critical, producing strength reductions of 29%, 44%, and 44% for wide, cubic, and slender pillars respectively. Double discontinuity configurations, particularly 30°-45° combinations, induced severe strength losses up to 54% in slender pillars (minimum strength:13.78 MPa), significantly exceeding single discontinuity effects. P-wave velocity reductions strongly correlated with strength degradation, reaching 14.4% and 15.1% for critical double discontinuity combinations in wide and slender pillars respectively. Two empirical equations were derived for strength prediction and showed excellent agreement with experimental data (R²= 0.949 and 0.924, respectively). The study offers validated pillar strength prediction tools using destructive and non-destructive approaches. The formulated equations and established relationships between discontinuity effects and geometry improve pillar design methodology, providing practical guidelines for underground mine operations.

JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciencesVol. 0(0)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strength Prediction of Underground Hard Rock Pillars: Effects of Geometric Ratio, complex and straightforward Discontinuities with different Dip Angles — Sherif M. Elsayed, M. Allam, et al. · JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences/JES. Journal of engineering sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS