Fundamental considerations for the use of explainable AI in law enforcement

Explainable AI (XAI) methods have the potential to make the use of AI in law enforcement more understandable, and ultimately more trustworthy. We argue that explanation requirements differ strongly between use cases and between stakeholders ranging from law enforcement officers to affected persons. While no currently known XAI method provides a guarantee to fully reflect the functioning of an AI model, XAI methods are currently the most promising means to bridge the gap between human and AI after increasing the human’s AI literacy. Even though the benefits of XAI vary strongly with the accuracy of the AI system and need to be balanced against incurring risks, like automation bias, we argue that not using XAI implies larger risks than exploring the technologies’ benefits and further developing it. In order to overcome existing shortcomings, we advocate for more collaborations between law enforcement agencies, academia, and industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1605619
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundamental considerations for the use of explainable AI in law enforcement

Maximilian Zocholl, Grégory Mounier, Dafni Stampouli, Mark Wittfoth
Frontiers in Political Science
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Fundamental considerations for the use of explainable AI in law enforcement

Maximilian Zocholl, Grégory Mounier, Dafni Stampouli, Mark Wittfoth
article en

Abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) methods have the potential to make the use of AI in law enforcement more understandable, and ultimately more trustworthy. We argue that explanation requirements differ strongly between use cases and between stakeholders ranging from law enforcement officers to affected persons. While no currently known XAI method provides a guarantee to fully reflect the functioning of an AI model, XAI methods are currently the most promising means to bridge the gap between human and AI after increasing the human’s AI literacy. Even though the benefits of XAI vary strongly with the accuracy of the AI system and need to be balanced against incurring risks, like automation bias, we argue that not using XAI implies larger risks than exploring the technologies’ benefits and further developing it. In order to overcome existing shortcomings, we advocate for more collaborations between law enforcement agencies, academia, and industry.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fundamental considerations for the use of explainable AI in law enforcement — Maximilian Zocholl, Grégory Mounier, et al. · Frontiers in Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS