Epidemiology of Vascular Access-Associated Infections in Hemodialysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in Tbilisi, Georgia (January 2022–January 2025)

Background Infections related to vascular access (VA) remain one of the most serious complications in hemodialysis (HD), contributing substantially to patient morbidity and mortality. Central venous catheters (CVCs) confer a substantially higher infection risk compared to arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), but local epidemiological data are limited. Objective We aimed to investigate the incidence of VA-related infections by access type (CVC vs. AVF, using access-days) and to identify risk factors, with secondary outcomes including infection-related hospitalization and mortality, in HD patients at the largest single center in Tbilisi, Georgia (2022-2025). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 386 adult HD patients from January 2022 to January 2025. Demographic, clinical, and VA data were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models assessed associations between VA type, diabetes, and infection or hospitalization, accounting for person-time at risk. Kaplan-Meier curves compared time-to-infection, and incidence rates were calculated per 1,000 access-days with corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and attributable fractions. Results Out of 386 patients, 208 (53.9%) used CVCs and 178 (46.1%) used AVFs. A total of 116 (30.1%) patients developed bacterial infections, of which 69 (59.5%) were access-related. The infection rate was markedly higher among CVC users compared with AVF users (0.731 vs. 0.042 infections per 1,000 access-days; incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 17.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.21-41.79; p < 0.001). The incidence rate difference was 0.689 infections per 1,000 access-days (95% CI: 0.50-0.88; p < 0.001), with an attributable fraction among the exposed of 94.2% (95% CI: 87.8-97.6). In the univariate Cox regression analysis, CVC use was strongly associated with an increased hazard of bloodstream infections (BSIs) (hazard ratio (HR) = 19.18; 95% CI: 8.72-42.23; p < 0.001) and infection-related hospitalization (HR = 4.10; 95% CI: 2.50-6.71; p < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus was not significantly associated with BSIs (HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.55-1.51; p = 0.715) but showed a weak association with hospitalization (HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00-1.07; p = 0.041). Age was not significantly related to either outcome. Infection-related mortality occurred in 23 (19.8%) patients. Conclusions Using CVCs is a significant and modifiable risk factor for VA-related infections in HD patients. Strategies to reduce CVC use focus on timely AVF placement, and strengthening infection control protocols is essential to decrease infection-related morbidity and mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.94959
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epidemiology of Vascular Access-Associated Infections in Hemodialysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in Tbilisi, Georgia (January 2022–January 2025)

Tamar Kasradze, Irma Tchokhonelidze, Tamar Didbaridze
Cureus
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Epidemiology of Vascular Access-Associated Infections in Hemodialysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in Tbilisi, Georgia (January 2022–January 2025)

Tamar Kasradze, Irma Tchokhonelidze, Tamar Didbaridze
article en

Abstract

Background Infections related to vascular access (VA) remain one of the most serious complications in hemodialysis (HD), contributing substantially to patient morbidity and mortality. Central venous catheters (CVCs) confer a substantially higher infection risk compared to arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), but local epidemiological data are limited. Objective We aimed to investigate the incidence of VA-related infections by access type (CVC vs. AVF, using access-days) and to identify risk factors, with secondary outcomes including infection-related hospitalization and mortality, in HD patients at the largest single center in Tbilisi, Georgia (2022-2025). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 386 adult HD patients from January 2022 to January 2025. Demographic, clinical, and VA data were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models assessed associations between VA type, diabetes, and infection or hospitalization, accounting for person-time at risk. Kaplan-Meier curves compared time-to-infection, and incidence rates were calculated per 1,000 access-days with corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and attributable fractions. Results Out of 386 patients, 208 (53.9%) used CVCs and 178 (46.1%) used AVFs. A total of 116 (30.1%) patients developed bacterial infections, of which 69 (59.5%) were access-related. The infection rate was markedly higher among CVC users compared with AVF users (0.731 vs. 0.042 infections per 1,000 access-days; incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 17.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.21-41.79; p < 0.001). The incidence rate difference was 0.689 infections per 1,000 access-days (95% CI: 0.50-0.88; p < 0.001), with an attributable fraction among the exposed of 94.2% (95% CI: 87.8-97.6). In the univariate Cox regression analysis, CVC use was strongly associated with an increased hazard of bloodstream infections (BSIs) (hazard ratio (HR) = 19.18; 95% CI: 8.72-42.23; p < 0.001) and infection-related hospitalization (HR = 4.10; 95% CI: 2.50-6.71; p < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus was not significantly associated with BSIs (HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.55-1.51; p = 0.715) but showed a weak association with hospitalization (HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00-1.07; p = 0.041). Age was not significantly related to either outcome. Infection-related mortality occurred in 23 (19.8%) patients. Conclusions Using CVCs is a significant and modifiable risk factor for VA-related infections in HD patients. Strategies to reduce CVC use focus on timely AVF placement, and strengthening infection control protocols is essential to decrease infection-related morbidity and mortality.

CureusVol. 17(10)
Tbilisi State Medical University (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.