Comparative Assessment of YOLO Segmentation Extensions for Intelligent Fire Detection

With the growing frequency of fire incidents, the demand for rapid and accurate fire detection technologies has become increasingly critical. In this study, we evaluate segmentation-based object detection models YOLO (You Only Look Once) v5-seg, YOLOv8-seg, and YOLOv11-seg for their ability to detect flames and smoke under identical experimental conditions. A total of 5,000 fire images were collected and split into training, validation, and test datasets. The same hardware environment and hyperparameter settings were used for model training to ensure a fair comparison. The experimental results reveal that YOLOv11-seg achieved the best overall performance, with a Precision of 0.710, Recall of 0.570, F1-score of 0.632, and mAP (mean Average Precision) 50 of 0.600. Notably, YOLOv11-seg achieved the highest Recall and mAP values for smoke detection, underscoring its effectiveness in identifying smoke—a critical factor for early fire detection. In terms of efficiency, YOLOv8-seg demonstrated the fastest inference speed, while YOLOv5-seg offered advantages in lightweight model size. However, YOLOv11-seg provided a balanced trade-off between computational cost and detection accuracy, making it the most suitable model for real-world fire response scenarios. Accordingly, this study proposes YOLOv11-seg as a robust baseline model for segmentation-based fire detection and provides a foundational reference for future research on deep learning-driven intelligent fire video analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Fire Science and Engineering
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7731/thesis.d14e3746
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of YOLO Segmentation Extensions for Intelligent Fire Detection

Sugi Choi, Heejun Kwon, Sangwon Lee, Haiyoung Jung et al.
International Journal of Fire Science and Engineering
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
article

Comparative Assessment of YOLO Segmentation Extensions for Intelligent Fire Detection

Sugi Choi, Heejun Kwon, Sangwon Lee, Haiyoung Jung, Jiwon Choi
article en

Abstract

With the growing frequency of fire incidents, the demand for rapid and accurate fire detection technologies has become increasingly critical. In this study, we evaluate segmentation-based object detection models YOLO (You Only Look Once) v5-seg, YOLOv8-seg, and YOLOv11-seg for their ability to detect flames and smoke under identical experimental conditions. A total of 5,000 fire images were collected and split into training, validation, and test datasets. The same hardware environment and hyperparameter settings were used for model training to ensure a fair comparison. The experimental results reveal that YOLOv11-seg achieved the best overall performance, with a Precision of 0.710, Recall of 0.570, F1-score of 0.632, and mAP (mean Average Precision) 50 of 0.600. Notably, YOLOv11-seg achieved the highest Recall and mAP values for smoke detection, underscoring its effectiveness in identifying smoke—a critical factor for early fire detection. In terms of efficiency, YOLOv8-seg demonstrated the fastest inference speed, while YOLOv5-seg offered advantages in lightweight model size. However, YOLOv11-seg provided a balanced trade-off between computational cost and detection accuracy, making it the most suitable model for real-world fire response scenarios. Accordingly, this study proposes YOLOv11-seg as a robust baseline model for segmentation-based fire detection and provides a foundational reference for future research on deep learning-driven intelligent fire video analysis.

International Journal of Fire Science and EngineeringVol. 39(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.