Steps Towards a Template for Fair Comparisons Between Single‐Use and Reusable Items

ABSTRACT In this paper, the factors taken up in LCA studies comparing single‐use to reuse are evaluated. Based on literature research, the insight was obtained that there are many single‐use vs. reuse comparisons that do not take into account the full picture of a reuse system. These factors are defined and further explored using single‐use/reuse system comparison case studies. A method to calculate the impact of reuse systems and to compare it to single‐use systems is presented in terms of equations based on the case studies. The equations are used to show the relevance of taking up specific parameters using different input values. Significance is shown for the following factors: Single‐use components in a reuse system Constant factors in a reuse system Pool size compared to system size in a reuse system Loss percentage With this method, several factors are taken up outside of LCA software in order to determine a break‐even point or to understand the trajectory of the system impact over rotations. Together with inventory reporting according to ISO 14040/14044 this can be the basis for transparent reuse system impact calculations and its fair comparison to single‐use system impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Packaging Technology and Science
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.70022
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steps Towards a Template for Fair Comparisons Between Single‐Use and Reusable Items

Max E. Van Den Berg, Roland ten Klooster
1 citations
Packaging Technology and Science
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
1.00
article

Steps Towards a Template for Fair Comparisons Between Single‐Use and Reusable Items

Max E. Van Den Berg, Roland ten Klooster
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, the factors taken up in LCA studies comparing single‐use to reuse are evaluated. Based on literature research, the insight was obtained that there are many single‐use vs. reuse comparisons that do not take into account the full picture of a reuse system. These factors are defined and further explored using single‐use/reuse system comparison case studies. A method to calculate the impact of reuse systems and to compare it to single‐use systems is presented in terms of equations based on the case studies. The equations are used to show the relevance of taking up specific parameters using different input values. Significance is shown for the following factors: Single‐use components in a reuse system Constant factors in a reuse system Pool size compared to system size in a reuse system Loss percentage With this method, several factors are taken up outside of LCA software in order to determine a break‐even point or to understand the trajectory of the system impact over rotations. Together with inventory reporting according to ISO 14040/14044 this can be the basis for transparent reuse system impact calculations and its fair comparison to single‐use system impact.

Packaging Technology and ScienceVol. 39(2)
Netherlands Nutrition Centre (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.