The Future of Engine Knock and Fuel Octane Numbers in the Era of Biofuels and Vehicle Electrification

Engine knock remains a critical limitation in spark-ignition engine design. Future hybrid powertrains employ downsized engines operating on Atkinson cycles, creating different knock conditions compared to modern naturally aspirated or turbocharged engines. At the same time, petroleum-based gasoline is increasingly being replaced by biofuels and electrofuels. This study evaluates knock behavior in projected hybrid engine architectures and examines the chemical composition of emerging fuel blends. The analysis shows that hybrid engines benefit from fuels with lower sensitivity, defined as the difference between the Research and Motor Octane Numbers. This is because the higher end-gas temperatures associated with the Atkinson cycle shift the value of K, which is an interpolation factor used to capture the relationship between fuel sensitivity and anti-knock performance. In conventional engines, K is negative, favoring fuels with higher sensitivity. In hybrid engines, the increased engine temperatures result in K becoming positive, favoring low-sensitivity fuels. Using low-sensitivity fuels allows hybrid engines to operate with higher geometric compression ratios and advanced thermodynamic cycles while reducing knock constraints. Biofuels and electrofuels can meet these requirements by producing paraffinic and naphthenic hydrocarbons with high octane quality and low sensitivity. These findings emphasize the need to align renewable fuel development with hybrid engine requirements to improve thermal efficiency, reduce emissions, and reduce reliance on energy-intensive refinery processes for octane enhancement.