LEADERSHIP IN A MULTIPOLAR WORLD: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP STYLES IN A MULTIPOLAR ENVIRONMENT
<p>This paper explores leadership styles in a multipolar world, focusing on USA, Europe Russia, China, and India. The research highlights how leadership approaches are shaped by the cultural, political, and economic contexts of these regions. Despite fundamental differences, several universal leadership traits emerge as key factors in the global landscape. This paper provides a systematic literature review on leadership styles in multipolar environments, comparing approaches across different geopolitical, corporate, and organizational contexts. Through an analysis of existing research, the study identifies key leadership characteristics that foster adaptability, collaboration, and strategic decision-making in a world where power is distributed among multiple actors. The USA adopts a predominantly democratic leadership style, encouraging innovation, employee autonomy, and transformational leadership. European leadership styles vary widely, balancing democratic and transformational approaches, though some regions still exhibit authoritarian tendencies. Russian leaders favor a mix of authoritarian and paternalistic styles, reinforced by strong political influence. Chinese leadership is often authoritarian and paternalistic, emphasizing centralized control and stability. Indian leadership combines authoritarian elements with flexibility, allowing for industry-specific adaptations. In a multipolar world, leaders must navigate complex environments, balancing stability with innovation.</p>
Authors
- Ana Aleksić Mirić (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9368-6501)
- Bilјana Kovačević (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-3763)
- Katarina Božić
Institutions
- University of East Sarajevo (BA)
- University of Belgrade (RS)
Publication Details
- Journal
- НОВИ ЕКОНОМИСТ
- Published
- 2025-10-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.69781/noek202538171
- Primary Topic
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00