Feasibility of Bedside Ultrasound-Guided Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Some cancer patients in palliative care need to access intravenous administration of medications to relieve symptoms. Few studies have explicitly assessed the safety and feasibility of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion at bedside in palliative care settings. In this study, we suggest the usefulness, safety, and feasibility of bedside ultrasound-guided PICC placement as a tool for improvement in the quality of life for patients in palliative and hospice care settings. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The study population, with terminal cancer and admitted to a palliative and hospice care unit in the Veterans Health Service Medical Center, was evaluated (N = 150). The patients were divided into two groups based on the methods of PICC insertion: Group 1 (PICC at bedside, N = 75) and Group 2 (PICC in intervention room, N = 75). The two groups were matched for age, sex, the level of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and types of primary cancer. <i>Results</i>: The success rates of the PICC procedure for Groups 1 and 2 were 89.33% and 97.33%, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.102). The mean duration (days) of catheter use was longer in Group 1 (23.31 ± 16.36) compared to that in Group 2 (21.90 ± 18.95), with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.639). Multivariable logistic regression analyses confirmed that Group 1 was not inferior to Group 2 regarding procedural success (Model 2, <i>p</i> = 0.21) and catheter dwell time (Model 2, <i>p</i> = 0.66). The most common cause of catheter removal in both groups was death, followed by self-removal and hospital discharge (<i>p</i> = 0.386). <i>Conclusions</i>: This study suggests that ultrasound-guided PICC insertion at bedside may have comparable procedural outcomes with potentially reducing the risks associated with intra-hospital patient transport compared with fluoroscopy-guided placement. We suggest this bedside approach can be considered a feasible and safe method for improving the quality of life of patients in palliative care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101876
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of Bedside Ultrasound-Guided Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Junyong Lee, Hwa Sun Kim, Jang Yong Kim, Hak Ryeong Kim
Medicina
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Feasibility of Bedside Ultrasound-Guided Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Cancer Patients in Palliative Care: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Junyong Lee, Hwa Sun Kim, Jang Yong Kim, Hak Ryeong Kim
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Some cancer patients in palliative care need to access intravenous administration of medications to relieve symptoms. Few studies have explicitly assessed the safety and feasibility of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion at bedside in palliative care settings. In this study, we suggest the usefulness, safety, and feasibility of bedside ultrasound-guided PICC placement as a tool for improvement in the quality of life for patients in palliative and hospice care settings. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The study population, with terminal cancer and admitted to a palliative and hospice care unit in the Veterans Health Service Medical Center, was evaluated (N = 150). The patients were divided into two groups based on the methods of PICC insertion: Group 1 (PICC at bedside, N = 75) and Group 2 (PICC in intervention room, N = 75). The two groups were matched for age, sex, the level of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and types of primary cancer. <i>Results</i>: The success rates of the PICC procedure for Groups 1 and 2 were 89.33% and 97.33%, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.102). The mean duration (days) of catheter use was longer in Group 1 (23.31 ± 16.36) compared to that in Group 2 (21.90 ± 18.95), with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.639). Multivariable logistic regression analyses confirmed that Group 1 was not inferior to Group 2 regarding procedural success (Model 2, <i>p</i> = 0.21) and catheter dwell time (Model 2, <i>p</i> = 0.66). The most common cause of catheter removal in both groups was death, followed by self-removal and hospital discharge (<i>p</i> = 0.386). <i>Conclusions</i>: This study suggests that ultrasound-guided PICC insertion at bedside may have comparable procedural outcomes with potentially reducing the risks associated with intra-hospital patient transport compared with fluoroscopy-guided placement. We suggest this bedside approach can be considered a feasible and safe method for improving the quality of life of patients in palliative care settings.

MedicinaVol. 61(10)
St. Mary's Hospital (US), Veterans Health Service Medical Center (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.