Global sampling decline erodes science potential of natural history collections

The world's natural history collections hold over two billion specimens, representing a unique spatial and taxonomic record of biodiversity on Earth over time. In recent decades, the accessibility and value of collections data have grown through specimen digitisation, enhanced connectivity, and enriched information from new genotyping and digital trait extraction. These advances are expanding the relevance of collections beyond taxonomy and evolutionary biology to fields like environmental monitoring, agriculture, biosecurity, and public health. However, their utility for addressing major global challenges relies on mobilising legacy data and continuing specimen collection and digitisation. Here we show substantial declines in the rates of collection of specimen data over recent decades, from analysis of over 150 million records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) spanning more than two centuries. The degree and timing of decline varies across taxonomic groups and geographical regions. Overall, these findings suggest that the value of natural history collections as global research infrastructure is eroding due to decreased collecting of specimen data across species, locations, and time. This is occurring precisely when applications for these data have never been more important, and advances in data analytics, AI and genomics promise to unlock deeper insights from natural history collections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64303-3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global sampling decline erodes science potential of natural history collections

Andrew G. Young, Owen Forbes, Peter H. Thrall
4 citations
Nature Communications
Species Distribution and Climate Change
7.35
article

Global sampling decline erodes science potential of natural history collections

Andrew G. Young, Owen Forbes, Peter H. Thrall
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The world's natural history collections hold over two billion specimens, representing a unique spatial and taxonomic record of biodiversity on Earth over time. In recent decades, the accessibility and value of collections data have grown through specimen digitisation, enhanced connectivity, and enriched information from new genotyping and digital trait extraction. These advances are expanding the relevance of collections beyond taxonomy and evolutionary biology to fields like environmental monitoring, agriculture, biosecurity, and public health. However, their utility for addressing major global challenges relies on mobilising legacy data and continuing specimen collection and digitisation. Here we show substantial declines in the rates of collection of specimen data over recent decades, from analysis of over 150 million records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) spanning more than two centuries. The degree and timing of decline varies across taxonomic groups and geographical regions. Overall, these findings suggest that the value of natural history collections as global research infrastructure is eroding due to decreased collecting of specimen data across species, locations, and time. This is occurring precisely when applications for these data have never been more important, and advances in data analytics, AI and genomics promise to unlock deeper insights from natural history collections.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Australian National Insect Collection (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
7.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.