Identification and Prioritization of Critical Barriers to the Adoption of Robots in the Construction Phase with Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and MICMAC Analysis

The adoption of robots in the construction phase can improve safety by replacing hazardous tasks and enhance productivity by automating repetitive work. Despite these advantages, adoption remains slow, constrained by economic, industrial, institutional, socio-cultural, and technological barriers. Wider acceptance is particularly urgent in construction, where fragmented processes, low profit margins, and safety risks make innovation both necessary and challenging. This study identified 22 critical barriers through a systematic literature review and categorized them into five dimensions. Beyond identification, the study prioritized these barriers using ISM and MICMAC analysis, clarifying which factors are fundamental drivers and which are outcome-related. The results showed that economic drivers occupy the base of the hierarchy and exert the greatest systemic influence, socio-cultural barriers emerge as highly dependent outcomes, and software usability acts as a linkage factor connecting technological immaturity with social acceptance. These findings reveal that barriers are interdependent rather than isolated and underscore the need for a structured prioritization framework. By applying ISM and MICMAC, this study presents a stepwise roadmap that differentiates fundamental drivers from outcome-related constraints, offering academic insights and practical guidance for policymakers to design strategies such as investment incentives, standardization, legal frameworks, and R&D expansion to accelerate adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203770
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification and Prioritization of Critical Barriers to the Adoption of Robots in the Construction Phase with Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and MICMAC Analysis

Jaemin Kim, Siwoo Jung, Seulki Lee
Buildings
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Identification and Prioritization of Critical Barriers to the Adoption of Robots in the Construction Phase with Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and MICMAC Analysis

Jaemin Kim, Siwoo Jung, Seulki Lee
article en

Abstract

The adoption of robots in the construction phase can improve safety by replacing hazardous tasks and enhance productivity by automating repetitive work. Despite these advantages, adoption remains slow, constrained by economic, industrial, institutional, socio-cultural, and technological barriers. Wider acceptance is particularly urgent in construction, where fragmented processes, low profit margins, and safety risks make innovation both necessary and challenging. This study identified 22 critical barriers through a systematic literature review and categorized them into five dimensions. Beyond identification, the study prioritized these barriers using ISM and MICMAC analysis, clarifying which factors are fundamental drivers and which are outcome-related. The results showed that economic drivers occupy the base of the hierarchy and exert the greatest systemic influence, socio-cultural barriers emerge as highly dependent outcomes, and software usability acts as a linkage factor connecting technological immaturity with social acceptance. These findings reveal that barriers are interdependent rather than isolated and underscore the need for a structured prioritization framework. By applying ISM and MICMAC, this study presents a stepwise roadmap that differentiates fundamental drivers from outcome-related constraints, offering academic insights and practical guidance for policymakers to design strategies such as investment incentives, standardization, legal frameworks, and R&D expansion to accelerate adoption.

BuildingsVol. 15(20)
Kwangwoon University (KR), Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.